Knowledge Repositories and Knowledgeable Action

In spite of the importance of knowledge reuse much is still unknown about how knowledge management artifacts influence reuse in practice. In this paper we use the concept of scaffolding to explore how knowledge repositories influence knowledgeable action. We conceptualize anchoring and adjustment as the processes involved in the use of scaffolding such as knowledge repositories. By viewing reuse in terms of these mechanisms, we can begin to consider the reuse processes individually as involving (1) choice of document for reuse and (2) adaptation of the document’s suggested solution applied to a current problem. We suggest the document acts as an anchor to frame the current problem consistent with the problem solved in the document, and that the suggested solution is then adapted through the adjustment process to meet the needs of the current problem. We subsequently explore the factors that influence both anchor choice and adjustment.

[1]  Wai Fong Boh,et al.  Reuse of knowledge assets from repositories: A mixed methods study , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Robin S. Poston,et al.  Effective Use of Knowledge Management Systems: A Process Model of Content Ratings and Credibility Indicators , 2005, MIS Q..

[3]  Nicholas Epley,et al.  A Tale of Tuned Decks? Anchoring as Accessibility and Anchoring as Adjustment , 2008 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[5]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: the introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[7]  P. Klahr,et al.  Managing Customer Support Knowledge , 1998 .

[8]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  Is Query Reuse Potentially Harmful? Anchoring and Adjustment in Adapting Existing Database Queries , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Andrew D. Henderson,et al.  Selection-Based Learning: The Coevolution of Internal and External Selection in High-Velocity Environments , 2004 .

[10]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[11]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  Peter H. Gray,et al.  A problem-solving perspective on knowledge management practices , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[14]  Martine R. Haas,et al.  Knowledge Gathering, Team Capabilities, and Project Performance in Challenging Work Environments , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Commentary on Wanda Orlikowski's ‘Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability’ , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  M. Boisot Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy , 1998 .

[18]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .