Audit of the Informed Consent Process as a Part of a Clinical Research Quality Assurance Program

Audits of the informed consent process are a key element of a clinical research quality assurance program. A systematic approach to such audits has not been described in the literature. In this paper we describe two components of the audit. The first is the audit of the informed consent document to verify adherence with federal regulations. The second component is comprised of the audit of the informed consent conference, with emphasis on a real time review of the appropriate communication of the key elements of the informed consent. Quality measures may include preparation of an informed consent history log, notes to accompany the informed consent, the use of an informed consent feedback tool, and the use of institutional surveys to assess comprehension of the informed consent process.

[1]  E F Cook,et al.  Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  C. Lidz The therapeutic misconception and our models of competency and informed consent. , 2006, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[3]  A. Derse Is Patients' Time Too Valuable for Informed Consent? , 2007, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[4]  I. de Melo-Martín,et al.  Beyond informed consent : the therapeutic misconception and trust , 2008 .

[5]  D. Barlow A time for consensus and consistency of reporting in clinical studies and the importance of new basic research , 2004 .

[6]  M. Jefford,et al.  Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[7]  Roger L Jansson Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions. , 2003, Washington law review.

[8]  A. Shamoo Policies and quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry. , 1991, Accountability in research.

[9]  A. Mangram,et al.  The informed consent: a study of the efficacy of informed consents and the associated role of language barriers. , 2011, Journal of surgical education.

[10]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Informed consent documentation necessary but not sufficient. , 2009, Contemporary clinical trials.

[11]  Kristin A Long Informed consent in pediatric cancer clinical trials: Giving adolescents a voice , 2010, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[12]  D. Resnik Do informed consent documents matter? , 2009, Contemporary Clinical Trials.

[13]  E. Larson,et al.  Measuring the process and quality of informed consent for clinical research: development and testing. , 2011, Oncology nursing forum.

[14]  Stjepan Oreskovic,et al.  Improving comprehension of informed consent. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[15]  T. Laitinen,et al.  Evaluation of informed consent in health research: a questionnaire survey. , 2010, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[16]  A Shonde,et al.  Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials. , 2008, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[17]  Pramod M. Lad,et al.  An Institutional Review Board-Based Clinical Research Quality Assurance Program , 2013, Accountability in research.

[18]  Roseann Barrett,et al.  Quality of informed consent: measuring understanding among participants in oncology clinical trials. , 2005, Oncology nursing forum.

[19]  N. Messer,et al.  Professional-patient relationships and informed consent , 2004, Postgraduate Medical Journal.