Accuracy improvement in evaluation of gas explosion overpressures in congestions with safety gaps

Abstract This paper reports a comparison of simulations and published data from experiments carried out by TNO Prins Maurits Laboratory on geometric configurations that involved safety gaps of various separation distances. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) based software – FLACS is utilized to conduct the numerical simulations. In the majority of cases, good agreement is found between the simulated results and those obtained by experiment in both the donor and acceptor modules. However, a large discrepancy in the overpressures in the acceptor module is seen when the size of the separation gap approaches one or two times of the module size. A Data-dump technique is used in this study to reset the turbulence length scale for these cases with different separation distances, five sets of explosion scenarios are then numerically simulated and the overpressures are compared with experimentally measured explosion overpressures. The overall results indicate that the software with the Data-dump technique is still an extremely effective tool when it comes to the evaluation of gas explosion overpressures in areas with large separation gaps.

[1]  John H. S. Lee,et al.  Influence of confinement on flame acceleration due to repeated obstacles , 1983 .

[2]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[3]  Jan Kindracki,et al.  Influence of ignition position and obstacles on explosion development in methane–air mixture in closed vessels , 2007 .

[4]  C. Paillard,et al.  Comparison between FLACS explosion simulations and experiments conducted in a PWR Steam Generator casemate scale down with hydrogen gradients , 2012 .

[5]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  The nature and large eddy simulation of coherent deflagrations in a vented enclosure-atmosphere system , 2006 .

[6]  S. Ibrahim,et al.  LES Modeling of Premixed Deflagrating Flames in a Small-Scale Vented Explosion Chamber with a Series of Solid Obstructions , 2008 .

[7]  Minggao Yu,et al.  Effects of cross-wise obstacle position on methane–air deflagration characteristics , 2013 .

[8]  Mathieu Ichard,et al.  Validation of FLACS against experimental data sets from the model evaluation database for LNG vapor dispersion , 2010 .

[9]  B. Lowesmith,et al.  Vapour cloud explosions in a long congested region involving methane/hydrogen mixtures , 2011 .

[10]  Prankul Middha,et al.  Validation of CFD-model for hydrogen dispersion , 2009 .

[11]  John H. S. Lee,et al.  Flame acceleration due to turbulence produced by obstacles , 1980 .

[12]  Bjørn H. Hjertager,et al.  COMPUTER SIMULATION OF TURBULENT REACTIVE GAS DYNAMICS , 1984 .

[13]  Andrzej Teodorczyk,et al.  Propagation of hydrogen-air detonation in tube with obstacles , 2011 .

[14]  N.H.A. Versloot,et al.  The multi-energy critical separation distance , 2003 .

[15]  Abdulmajid M. Na'inna,et al.  The acceleration of flames in tube explosions with two obstacles as a function of the obstacle separation distance , 2013 .

[16]  V. I. Alekseev,et al.  Experimental study of flame acceleration and the deflagration-to-detonation transition under conditions of transverse venting , 2001 .

[17]  Prankul Middha,et al.  CFD calculations of gas leak dispersion and subsequent gas explosions: validation against ignited impinging hydrogen jet experiments. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.