Conceptual and methodological issues in the judgment of facial expressions of emotion

In two studies, subjects judged a set of facial expressions of emotion by either providing labels of their own choice to describe the stimuli (free-choice condition), choosing a label from a list of emotion words, or choosing a story from a list of emotion stories (fixed-choice conditions). In the free-choice condition, levels of agreement between subjects on the predicted emotion categories for six basic emotions were significantly greater than chance levels, and comparable to those shown in fixed-choice studies. As predicted, there was little to no agreement on a verbal label for contempt. Agreement on contempt was greatly improved when subjects were allowed to identify the expression in terms of an antecedent event for that emotion rather than in terms of a single verbal label, a finding that could not be attributed to the methodological artifact of exclusion in a fixed-choice paradigm. These findings support two conclusions: (1) that the labels used in fixed-choice paradigms accurately reflect the verbal categories people use when free labeling facial expressions of emotion, and (2) that lexically ambiguous emotions, such as contempt, are understood in terms of their situational meanings.

[1]  C. Darwin.  The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals , .

[2]  J. F. Dashiell.  Principles of Psychology. , 1927 .

[3]  J. Guilford.  Psychometric methods, 2nd ed. , 1954 .

[4]  S. Tomkins,et al.  What and Where are the Primary Affects? Some Evidence for a Theory , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  P. Ekman,et al.  Pan-Cultural Elements in Facial Displays of Emotion , 1969, Science.

[6]  C. Izard.  The face of emotion , 1971 .

[7]  P. Ekman,et al.  Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  P. Ekman.  Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. , 1972 .

[9]  R. Levy.  TAHITIANS: MIND AND EXPERIENCE IN THE SOCIETY ISLANDS by ROBERT I. LEVY. University of Chicago Press, 1973. 547 pp. $12.50. Reviewed by R. F. Salisbury , 1975 .

[10]  P. Ekman,et al.  Unmasking the face : a guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues , 1975 .

[11]  P. Ekman.  Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .

[12]  P. Ekman,et al.  Facial Expressions of Emotion , 1979 .

[13]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[14]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[15]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. , 1985, Psychological review.

[16]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive psychology and its implications, 2nd ed. , 1985 .

[17]  P. Ekman,et al.  A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion , 1986 .

[18]  A. Wierzbicka.  Human Emotions: Universal or Culture-Specific? , 1986 .

[19]  K. Scherer,et al.  Experiencing emotion : a cross-cultural study , 1986 .

[20]  J. Russell,et al.  Relativity in the Perception of Emotion in Facial Expressions , 1987 .

[21]  P. Ekman,et al.  DIFFERENCES Universals and Cultural Differences in the Judgments of Facial Expressions of Emotion , 2004 .

[22]  C. Izard,et al.  On the form and universality of the contempt expression: A challenge to Ekman and Friesen's claim of discovery , 1988 .

[23]  Paul Ekman,et al.  The universality of a contempt expression: A replication , 1988 .

[24]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings , 1988 .

[25]  P. Ekman,et al.  American-Japanese cultural differences in intensity ratings of facial expressions of emotion , 1989 .

[26]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments , 1990 .

[27]  S. Shott,et al.  Statistics for Health Professionals , 1990 .

[28]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Duchenne smile: emotional expression and brain physiology. II. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  P. Ekman,et al.  Type A behavior pattern: facial behavior and speech components. , 1990, Psychosomatic medicine.

[30]  J. A. Russell,et al.  The contempt expression and the relativity thesis , 1991 .

[31]  P. Ekman,et al.  Contradictions in the study of contempt: What's it all about? Reply to Russell , 1991 .

[32]  J. Russell.  Negative results on a reported facial expression of contempt , 1991 .

[33]  P. Ekman,et al.  Confusions about context in the judgment of facial expression: A reply to “the contempt expression and the relativity thesis” , 1991 .

[34]  R. Lazarus.  Emotion and Adaptation , 1991 .

[35]  Harriett B. Holder,et al.  Interpretation of Emotion From Facial Expressions in Children With and Without Learning Disabilities , 1991, Journal of learning disabilities.

[36]  J. Russell.  Rejoinder to Ekman, O'Sullivan, and Matsumoto , 1991 .

[37]  David Matsumoto,et al.  More evidence for the universality of a contempt expression , 1992 .

[38]  H. Wagner.  On measuring performance in category judgment studies of nonverbal behavior , 1993 .

[39]  P. Ekman,et al.  Coherence between expressive and experiential systems in emotion , 1994 .

[40]  J. Russell.  Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  P. Ekman,et al.  Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: a reply to Russell's mistaken critique. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  J. Russell,et al.  Fuzzy concepts in a fuzzy hierarchy: varieties of anger. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.