Representation of Water Table Dynamics in a Land Surface Scheme. Part II: Subgrid Variability

A lumped unconfined aquifer model has been developed and interactively coupled to a land surface scheme in a companion paper. Here, the issue of the representation of subgrid variability of water table depths (WTDs) is addressed. A statistical–dynamical (SD) approach is used to account for the effects of the unresolved subgrid variability of WTD in the grid-scale groundwater runoff. The dynamic probability distribution function (PDF) of WTD is specified as a two-parameter gamma distribution based on observations. The grid-scale groundwater rating curve (i.e., aquifer storage–discharge relationship) is derived statistically by integrating a point groundwater runoff model with respect to the PDF of WTD. Next, a mosaic approach is utilized to account for the effects of subgrid variability of WTD in the grid-scale groundwater recharge. A grid cell is categorized into different subgrids based on the PDF of WTD. The grid-scale hydrologic fluxes are computed by averaging all of the subgrid fluxes weighted by their fractions. This new methodology combines the strengths of the SD approach and the mosaic approach. The results of model testing in Illinois from 1984 to 1994 indicate that the simulated hydrologic variables (soil saturation and WTD) and fluxes (evaporation, runoff, and groundwater recharge) agree well with the observations. Because of the paucity of the large-scale observations on WTD, the development of a practical parameter estimation procedure is indispensable before the global implementation of the developed scheme of water table dynamics in climate models.

[1]  Elfatih A. B. Eltahir,et al.  Representation of Water Table Dynamics in a Land Surface Scheme. Part I: Model Development , 2005 .

[2]  Pat Jen-Feng Yeh,et al.  Representation of water table dynamics in a land surface scheme : observations, models, and analyses , 2003 .

[3]  V. Gupta,et al.  A physically based filter for separating base flow from streamflow time series , 2001 .

[4]  Zhenghui Xie,et al.  A new surface runoff parameterization with subgrid-scale soil heterogeneity for land surface models , 2001 .

[5]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  A catchment‐based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model: 1. Model structure , 2000 .

[6]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Estimation of the ARNO model baseflow parameters using daily streamflow data , 1999 .

[7]  S. Ghan,et al.  Parameterizing Subgrid Orographic Precipitation and Surface Cover in Climate Models , 1998 .

[8]  Elfatih A. B. Eltahir,et al.  Hydroclimatology of Illinois: A comparison of monthly evaporation estimates based on atmospheric water balance and soil water balance , 1998 .

[9]  F. Giorgi,et al.  An Approach for the Representation of Surface Heterogeneity in Land Surface Models. Part I: Theoretical Framework , 1997 .

[10]  F. Giorgi,et al.  An Approach for the Representation of Surface Heterogeneity in Land Surface Models. Part II: Validation and Sensitivity Experiments , 1997 .

[11]  David Rind,et al.  An Efficient Approach to Modeling the Topographic Control of Surface Hydrology for Regional and Global Climate Modeling , 1997 .

[12]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of general circulation models' subgrid variability and patchiness of rainfall and soil moisture on land surface water balance fluxes , 1995 .

[13]  S. Ghan,et al.  A subgrid parameterization of orographic precipitation , 1995 .

[14]  Robert E. Dickinson,et al.  Simulating fluxes from heterogeneous land surfaces: Explicit subgrid method employing the biosphere‐atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) , 1994 .

[15]  G. Bonan,et al.  Influence of Subgrid-Scale Heterogeneity in Leaf Area Index, Stomatal Resistance, and Soil Moisture on Grid-Scale Land–Atmosphere Interactions , 1993 .

[16]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  The Implementation and Validation of Improved Land-Surface Hydrology in an Atmospheric General Circulation Model , 1993 .

[17]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme(BATS) version 1e as coupled to the NCAR community climate model , 1993 .

[18]  Roni Avissar,et al.  Conceptual aspects of a statistical‐dynamical approach to represent landscape subgrid‐scale heterogeneities in atmospheric models , 1992 .

[19]  R. Koster,et al.  Modeling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands , 1992 .

[20]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  A land-surface hydrology parameterization with subgrid variability for general circulation models , 1992 .

[21]  Tom G. Chapman,et al.  Comment on Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses by R. J. Nathan , 1991 .

[22]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Evapotranspiration and runoff from large land areas: Land surface hydrology for atmospheric general circulation models , 1991 .

[23]  T. McMahon,et al.  Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses , 1990 .

[24]  P. Domenico,et al.  Physical and chemical hydrogeology , 1990 .

[25]  A. Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Sensitivity of regional climates to localized precipitation in global models , 1990, Nature.

[26]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology , 1989 .

[27]  P. S. Eagleson,et al.  Land Surface Hydrology Parameterization for Atmospheric General Circulation models Including Subgrid Scale Spatial Variability , 1989 .

[28]  A. Dalcher,et al.  A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for Use within General Circulation Models , 1986 .

[29]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[30]  D. L. Peck,et al.  Specific Yield Compilation of Specific Yields for Various Materials , 1967 .