Leveraging E-Identities: The Impact of Percieved Diversity on Team Social Integration and Performance

Virtual teams (VTs) are increasingly being employed by organizations, presenting managers and researchers with challenges that collocated teams do not face. VTs are likely to be diverse and lack opportunities to readily communicate personal information to build relationships. Research on team diversity shows mixed results regarding the impact of diversity on team integration and performance, with both positive and negative impacts observed. This study asks the question: Can we minimize the negative impact of perceived deep-level diversity on performance while still leveraging the benefits of actual deep-level diversity? We examine how technology can be used to influence perceptions of deep-level diversity in order to attenuate the negative impact of diversity. Results show that diversity in general, deep-level, attributes can be influenced via the use of eidentity profiles, providing support for the idea that we can minimize social tension due to deeplevel diversity, while still reaping the benefits from actual diversity.

[1]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  To Your Heart's Content: A Model of Affective Diversity in Top Management Teams , 2000 .

[2]  I. Jolliffe.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[3]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes. , 1969 .

[4]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[5]  Peter Mykytyn,et al.  Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teams , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[7]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[8]  P. Blau.  Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure , 1978 .

[9]  Jonathan A. Rhoades,et al.  Interaction process in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups , 1995, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[10]  J. Kohnen,et al.  Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations , 1997 .

[11]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[12]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[13]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Implications of Strategy and Social Context for the Relationship Between Top , 2002 .

[15]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Team Orientation, Self-Orientation, and Diversity in Task Groups , 1998 .

[17]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[18]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[19]  Kristine L. Nowak.  Sex Categorization in Computer Mediated Communication (CMC): Exploring the Utopian Promise , 2003 .

[20]  S. K. Horwitz,et al.  The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography , 2007 .

[21]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[22]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[23]  C. H. Castore,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of the Impact of Group Composition on Group Performance and Cohesion. , 1976 .

[24]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[25]  D. Turban,et al.  Supervisor-subordinate similarity: types, effects, and mechanisms. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[27]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[28]  Patricia Pitcher,et al.  Top Management Team Heterogeneity: Personality, Power, and Proxies , 2001 .

[29]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  D. H. Saphiere.  Productive behaviors of global business teams , 1996 .

[31]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[32]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[33]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  CONFLICT AND SHARED IDENTITY IN GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS , 2001 .

[34]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[35]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[36]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[37]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[38]  John A Scigliano,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques that Succeed: Deborah L. Duarte and Nancy Tennant Snyder. (2000). 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 256 pages. ISBN: 0-7879-5589-2W01. US$39.95, includes a CD-ROM , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[39]  J. Turner.  Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. , 2010 .

[40]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Team diversity and information use , 2005 .

[41]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .

[42]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[43]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[44]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Katherine W. Phillips,et al.  Surface-Level Diversity and Decision-Making in Groups: When Does Deep-Level Similarity Help? , 2006 .

[46]  C. Deusen,et al.  Top management teams of international joint ventures in Thailand: the effects of heterogeneity on group processes and goal attainment , 2004 .

[47]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Cultural diversity''s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diver , 1993 .

[48]  Katharina Schmid,et al.  The Social Psychology of intergroup relations , 2009 .

[49]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  Diversity and Emotion: The New Frontiers in Organizational Behavior Research , 2002 .

[50]  Eric Wargo,et al.  Psychological Science in the Public Interest , 2006 .

[51]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[52]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  The Impact of Individualism—Collectivism, Social Presence, and Group Diversity on Group Decision Making Under Majority Influence , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  S. Jackson,et al.  7 UNDERSTANDING THE DYNAMICS OF DIVERSITY IN DECISION-MAKING TEAMS , 2004 .

[54]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[55]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[56]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence , 1991 .

[57]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Work group diversity. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[58]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[59]  V. Glăveanu.  What Differences Make A Difference? A Discussion of Hegemony, Resistance and Representation , 2009 .