Elemental composition determination based on MSn

MOTIVATION Identification of metabolites is essential for its use as biomarkers, for research in systems biology and for drug discovery. The first step before a structure can be elucidated is to determine its elemental composition. High-resolution mass spectrometry, which provides the exact mass, together with common constraint rules, for rejecting false proposed elemental compositions, cannot always provide one unique elemental composition solution. RESULTS The Multistage Elemental Formula (MEF) tool is presented in this article to enable the correct assignment of elemental composition to compounds, their fragment ions and neutral losses that originate from the molecular ion by using multistage mass spectrometry (MS(n)). The method provided by MEF reduces the list of predicted elemental compositions for each ion by analyzing the elemental compositions of its parent (precursor ion) and descendants (fragments). MS(n) data of several metabolites were processed using the MEF tool to assign the correct elemental composition and validate the efficacy of the method. Especially, the link between the mass accuracy needed to generate one unique elemental composition and the topology of the MS(n) tree (the width and the depth of the tree) was addressed. This method makes an important step toward semi-automatic de novo identification of metabolites using MS(n) data. AVAILABILITY Software available at: http://abs.lacdr.gorlaeus.net/people/rojas-cherto CONTACT m.rojas@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl; t.reijmers@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

[1]  Christophe Deprez,et al.  Automated molecular formula determination by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). , 2009, The Analyst.

[2]  L Roberts The rush to publish. , 1991, Science.

[3]  Oliver Fiehn,et al.  Seven Golden Rules for heuristic filtering of molecular formulas obtained by accurate mass spectrometry , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[4]  Peter Murray-Rust,et al.  Development of chemical markup language (CML) as a system for handling complex chemical content , 2001 .

[5]  William DeMaio,et al.  Spectral accuracy of molecular ions in an LTQ/Orbitrap mass spectrometer and implications for elemental composition determination , 2009, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[6]  Ming Gu,et al.  Accurate mass filtering of ion chromatograms for metabolite identification using a unit mass resolution liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry system. , 2006, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[7]  Oliver Fiehn,et al.  Metabolomic database annotations via query of elemental compositions: Mass accuracy is insufficient even at less than 1 ppm , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  Fred W. McLafferty,et al.  Computer‐aided interpretation of mass spectra. STIRS prediction of rings‐plus‐double‐bonds values , 1977 .

[9]  Henry S. Rzepa,et al.  Chemical Markup, XML, and the World Wide Web. 4. CML Schema , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Jeffrey W. Bode,et al.  Reactor ChemAxon Ltd., Maramaros koz 2/a, Budapest, 1037 Hungary. www.chemaxon.com. Contact ChemAxon for pricing information. , 2004 .

[11]  David I. Ellis,et al.  Metabolomics: Current analytical platforms and methodologies , 2005 .

[12]  Alan G. Marshall,et al.  Truly “exact” mass: Elemental composition can be determined uniquely from molecular mass measurement at ∼0.1 mDa accuracy for molecules up to ∼500 Da , 2006 .

[13]  Cristina Draghici,et al.  Molecular formula analysis by an MS/MS/MS technique to expedite dereplication of natural products. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Chris F. Taylor,et al.  A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  E. Kunkel Systems biology in drug discovery , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Norbert Stoll,et al.  Isotope pattern evaluation for the reduction of elemental compositions assigned to high-resolution mass spectral data from electrospray ionization fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry , 2006, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[17]  Florian Rasche,et al.  Computing fragmentation trees from tandem mass spectrometry data. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  Ilkka Ojanperä,et al.  Differentiation of structural isomers in a target drug database by LC/Q-TOFMS using fragmentation prediction. , 2010, Drug testing and analysis.

[19]  Rajarshi Guha,et al.  Chemical Informatics Functionality in R , 2007 .

[20]  Egon L. Willighagen,et al.  The Blue Obelisk—Interoperability in Chemical Informatics , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  Egon L. Willighagen,et al.  The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An Open-Source Java Library for Chemo-and Bioinformatics , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[22]  Oliver Fiehn,et al.  Advances in structure elucidation of small molecules using mass spectrometry , 2010, Bioanalytical reviews.

[23]  R. Geoff. Dromey,et al.  Calculation of elemental compositions from high resolution mass spectral data , 1980 .

[24]  R. Abagyan,et al.  XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  J. K. Senior Partitions and Their Representative Graphs , 1951 .

[26]  F. Song,et al.  Rapid identification of saponins in plant extracts by electrospray ionization multi-stage tandem mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. , 2000, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[27]  F. McLafferty,et al.  Computer‐aided interpretation of mass spectra , 1969 .

[28]  Warwick B Dunn,et al.  Current trends and future requirements for the mass spectrometric investigation of microbial, mammalian and plant metabolomes , 2008, Physical biology.

[29]  Henry S. Rzepa,et al.  Chemical Markup, XML, and the World Wide Web. 6. CMLReact, an XML Vocabulary for Chemical Reactions , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..