Is non-subject based research training a ‘waste of time’, good only for the development of professional skills? An academic literacies perspective

In recent years, contentiously for some, universities have developed generalist skills lists and associated curricula in response to government demand for more ‘employment-ready’ graduates. Such training usually includes writing and communication. In Australia and the UK, guidelines designed to support the development of skills programmes describe research training as ‘generic skills’ and/or ‘discipline-based’. This framing effectively precludes a discussion of academic literacies perspectives on curriculum development and pedagogy for research training. In a review of some key insights from academic literacies and consideration of their implications for research training, the article discusses why academic literacies are not skills-based, strictly generic or informed by the students' discipline. The article suggests a reframing of the terms of research skills discussion to accommodate academic literacies perspectives. This would involve recognition of curriculum and pedagogy that aims to introduce the complex and diverse written genres, research purposes, rhetorical conventions, language functions and cultural norms that students are working with, an approach supportive of both effective student writing and subject learning.

[1]  John J. Ruszkiewicz,et al.  Everything's an Argument , 2014 .

[2]  Kate Cadman,et al.  English for Academic Possibilities: the research proposal as a contested site in postgraduate genre pedagogy , 2002 .

[3]  T. Fox,et al.  A Geopolitics Of Academic Writing , 2002 .

[4]  Linda Y. Li,et al.  Supporting the thesis writing process of international research students through an ongoing writing group , 2011 .

[5]  Christine B. Feak,et al.  English in today's research world : a writing guide : a sequel to Academic writing for graduate students and an advanced text mainly designed for junior scholars and graduate students who are not native speakers of English , 2000 .

[6]  Alan G. Gross,et al.  The rhetoric of science , 1990 .

[7]  Christine B. Feak,et al.  Telling a Research Story: Writing a Literature Review , 2009 .

[8]  A. Collins.  Introduction to Reasoning , 1988 .

[9]  Suzanne Eggins,et al.  An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics , 1994 .

[10]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  Discipline-related Models for a Structured Program at the Commencement of a PhD , 1999 .

[11]  Z. Fang.  Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective , 2005 .

[12]  B. Simpson,et al.  Writes of passage: writing up qualitative data as a threshold concept in doctoral research , 2012 .

[13]  G. Myers,et al.  Textbooks and the sociology of scientific knowledge , 1992 .

[14]  Christine B. Feak,et al.  Academic Communications and the Graduate Student , 2001 .

[15]  John M. Swales,et al.  Navigating Academia: Writing Supporting Genres , 2011 .

[16]  D. Crystal,et al.  English as a Global Language , 1998 .

[17]  Ilona Leki,et al.  "Completely Different Worlds": EAP and the Writing Experiences of ESL Students in University Courses , 1997 .

[18]  Charles Bazerman,et al.  Handbook of research on writing : history, society, school, individual, text , 2007 .

[19]  Françoise Salager-Meyer,et al.  Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse , 1994 .

[20]  Ulla Connor,et al.  New Directions in Contrastive Rhetoric , 2002 .

[21]  Teresa Dovey,et al.  Facilitating writing from sources: A focus on both process and product , 2010 .

[22]  Mary Lea.  Academic literacies in theory and practice , 2008 .

[23]  Beyond the local/general divide: English for academic purposes and process approaches to cross disciplinary, doctoral writing support , 2011 .

[24]  Vijay K. Bhatia,et al.  Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings , 2014 .

[25]  Brian Paltridge,et al.  Thesis and dissertation writing: an examination of published advice and actual practice , 2002 .

[26]  Eliza Burke,et al.  Disciplining writing: the case for multi‐disciplinary writing groups to support writing for publication by higher degree by research candidates in the humanities, arts and social sciences , 2009 .

[27]  Margaret Zeegers,et al.  Generic skills training , 2006 .

[28]  V. Trafford,et al.  Achieving a doctorate: metalearning and research development programmes supporting success for international distance students , 2004 .

[29]  S. Carter.  Doctorate as genre: supporting thesis writing across campus , 2011 .

[30]  Pat Thomson,et al.  Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for supervision , 2006 .

[31]  T. Lillis,et al.  Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy , 2015 .

[32]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  Genre Relations: Mapping Culture , 2008 .

[33]  B. Samraj,et al.  A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions , 2008 .

[34]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Talking to Students: Metadiscourse in IntroductoryCoursebooks , 1999 .

[35]  John M. Swales,et al.  Academic writing for graduate students : essential tasks and skills : a course for nonnative speakers of English , 1996 .

[36]  Ann M. Johns,et al.  Text, Role and Context: Developing Academic Literacies , 1997 .

[37]  Gina Wisker,et al.  Recognising and Overcoming Dissonance in Postgraduate Student Research , 2003 .

[38]  B. Cope,et al.  The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing , 1993 .

[39]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction , 2007 .

[40]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  How Students Argue Scientific Claims: A Rhetorical‐Semantic Analysis , 2003 .

[41]  Susan H. Diehl.  Developing students' writing skills: an early intervention approach. , 2007 .

[42]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .