Haptic, visual and visuo-haptic softness judgments for objects with deformable surfaces

The purpose of this study is to investigate multisensory visual-haptic softness perception using deformable objects. We created a set of rubber specimens, whose compliance varied in a controlled fashion (0.11 to 0.96 mm/N), but which were otherwise indistinguishable. Participants judged the magnitude of the stimuli according to their softness under haptic-only, vision-only and visuo-haptic conditions. In haptic and visuo-haptic conditions participants explored the stimuli without and with vision of their exploratory movements, respectively. In visual conditions, participants watched how another person explored the stimuli. Participants were well able to differentiate between the different stimuli under all three modality conditions. Stimuli were judged to be slightly softer under vision-only conditions than under haptic-only conditions; visuo-haptic judgments were in-between (average visual weight: 55%). These findings demonstrate that a) participants can reliably infer softness from indirect visual information alone-that is from watching corresponding exploratory movements and stimulus deformations-, and that b) such visual information has a major contribution to visuo-haptic softness judgments. We further observed that judgments were more variable under visual as compared to haptic conditions; the variability of visuo-haptic judgments was similar to that of haptic ones. The lack of benefit from adding visual to haptic information, and the contrast between the relatively high visual weight in visuo-haptic judgments on the one hand and the low reliability of visual relative to haptic-only information on the other hand, suggest that the integration of visual and haptic judgments was not optimal, but biased towards vision.

[1]  Knut Drewing,et al.  Human Haptic Perception and the Design of Haptic-Enhanced Virtual Environments , 2008, The Sense of Touch and its Rendering.

[2]  M. A. Srinivassan The impact of visual information on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments , 1996 .

[3]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[4]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception , 1999, Vision Research.

[5]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  Kinaesthetic and Cutaneous Contributions to the Perception of Compressibility , 2008, EuroHaptics.

[6]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  M. Landy,et al.  A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues , 1993, Vision Research.

[8]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Integrating multimodal information about surface texture via a probe: relative contributions of haptic and touch-produced sound sources , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[9]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Haptic discrimination of softness in teleoperation: the role of the contact area spread rate , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[11]  S. Lederman Auditory Texture Perception , 1979, Perception.

[12]  M. Ernst,et al.  Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[14]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[15]  I. Hunter,et al.  A perceptual analysis of stiffness , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Eli Brenner,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(98)00162-X , 1998 .

[18]  J. Todd,et al.  The perception of surface curvature from optical motion , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Texture and haptic cues in slant discrimination: reliability-based cue weighting without statistically optimal cue combination. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[20]  S. S. Stevens Issues in psychophysical measurement. , 1971 .

[21]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  The Effect of Auditory Cues on the Haptic Perception of Stiffness in Virtual Environments , 1997, Dynamic Systems and Control.

[23]  A. Kappers,et al.  Analysis of haptic perception of materials by multidimensional scaling and physical measurements of roughness and compressibility. , 2006, Acta psychologica.