THE IMPACT OF WEED CONTROL METHODS ON SUGAR BEET CROP

The effect of non-chemical weed control on organically grown sugar beet crop productivity and quality was tested at the Experimental Station of the Aleksandras Stulginskis University in 2015-2016. The aim of the experiment was to ascertain the influence of living mulch, mechanical (mellowing, cutting, mulching) and physical (steaming) weed control methods on sugar beet productivity and quality parameters. There were tested 6 weed control methods: inter-row mellowing (control treatment), cutting and mulching with weeds, Persian clover, white mustard and spring barley, inter-row steaming. Different alternative weed control methods usually had negative significant impact on the sugar beet crop yield except inter-row steaming treatment. In these plots, decrease of root yield was insignificantly less compared with control treatment. The effect of weed control methods on sugar beet root quality parameters was weak.

[1]  Chengci Chen,et al.  Impact of a living mulch cover crop on sugarbeet establishment, root yield and sucrose purity , 2018, Field Crops Research.

[2]  Francesco Tei,et al.  Non-chemical weed management strategies in minor crops: A review , 2017 .

[3]  M. Senge,et al.  Recent advances in mulching materials and methods for modifying soil environment , 2017 .

[4]  D. Makowski,et al.  Can legume companion plants control weeds without decreasing crop yield? A meta-analysis , 2017 .

[5]  F. Celette,et al.  Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: Complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms. A review , 2017 .

[6]  H. Kristensen,et al.  Cover crops in organic field vegetable production , 2016 .

[7]  R. Gerhards,et al.  Weed Suppression of Living Mulch in Sugar Beets , 2016, Gesunde Pflanzen.

[8]  M. Komatsuzaki,et al.  Effect of no-tillage with weed cover mulching versus conventional tillage on global warming potential and nitrate leaching , 2015 .

[9]  M. Kropff,et al.  Clover as a cover crop for weed suppression in an intercropping design: II. Competitive ability of several clover species , 2007 .

[10]  Richard Bennett,et al.  Environmental and human health impacts of growing genetically modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet: a life-cycle assessment. , 2004, Plant biotechnology journal.

[11]  Afandi,et al.  Effect of weed management in coffee plantation on soil chemical properties , 2004, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[12]  M. Liedgens,et al.  Interactions of maize and Italian ryegrass in a living mulch system: (2) Nitrogen and water dynamics , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[13]  E. Šarauskis,et al.  Effect of cover crops in smothering weeds and volunteer plants in alternative farming systems , 2017 .

[14]  A. Sakalauskas,et al.  Interaction of maize and living mulch: Soil chemical properties and bioactivity , 2012 .

[15]  E. Šarauskis,et al.  Non-chemical weed control in sugar beet crop under an intensive and conservation soil tillage pattern: II. Crop productivity. , 2009 .

[16]  K. Romaneckas,et al.  Non-chemical weed control in sugar beet crop under intensive and conservation soil tillage: I. Crop weediness , 2009 .

[17]  L. Bastiaans,et al.  WEED MANAGEMENT IN LOW-EXTERNAL-INPUT AND ORGANIC FARMING SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[18]  J. Conroy,et al.  Weed control systems in sugar-beet. , 1980 .