Vibrations in the orbwebs of Nuctenea sclopetaria (Araneidae)

SummaryOrbweaving spiders build an elaborate web to trap aerial prey. The web transmits vibration cues about the presence and location of entangled prey to the spider, which is usually waiting at the hub of the web. This paper examines the web as a medium for vibration transmission between the prey-catching region and the hub. Three types of vibration are propagated along a radius: longitudinal (motion directed along the strand's axis), transverse (motion perpendicular to the strand and to the web), and lateral (motion perpendicular to the strand and in the plant of the web). The web was stimulated in the middle of the preycatching region with one type of vibration, and the amount of that same type of vibration appearing at the hub was measured. In an empty web longitudinal vibration reaches the hub with almost no attenuation over the frequency range of 1 to 10,000 Hz (Fig. 3). Transverse vibration is attenuated by ∼15 dB at 1 Hz and transmission drops more or less linearly to ∼35 dB attenuation at 10 kHz. Lateral vibration is attenuated ∼23 dB between 1 and ∼200 Hz, and attenuation increases to ∼40 dB between 1 and 10 kHz. Individual webs (Fig. 4) show resonance effects (peaks and troughs in transmission) above ∼1 kHz. The distance over which the signal was transmitted (63±11 mm) was not correlated with the amount of attenuation. The three types of vibration vary in directionality (Fig. 5), that is, in how greatly the amplitude of the stimulated radius differs from that of its nonstimulated neighbors at the hub. Longitudinal vibration is the most directional and consequently it may play the dominant role in the spider's choice of radius to run out along to reach trapped prey. In a web containing the spider and/or prey, the web/object system tends to resonate at frequencies that depend on the weight of the objects, their position in the web, and the types of vibration (Fig. 6). A 200 mg spider at the hub of the web will oscillate at ∼10 Hz for longitudinal and lateral vibration, and at ∼4 Hz for transverse vibration. A 1 to 2 mg insect in the catching zone oscillates at ∼100 Hz for longitudinal vibration but a 100 mg insect oscillates at only ∼4 Hz for transverse vibration. Generally, resonance effects due to web loading will be confined to frequencies below a few hundred Hz. The presence of a spider at the hub modifies the transmission curves derived from the empty web. For longitudinal vibration, signals from the prey-catching zone to the spider's tarsus (Fig. 7) are attenuated by several dB below ∼300 Hz and by ∼20 dB/decade above this frequency. For transverse and lateral vibration, transmission to the spider could not be measured and must be estimated from that obtained in the empty web. Qualitative aspects of vibration transmission across web crossings are discussed using the physical properties of radial and sticky-spiral strands (Table 1).

[1]  C. V. Boys,et al.  The Influence of a Tuning-Fork on the Garden Spider , 1880, Nature.

[2]  Charles Walcott,et al.  The physiology of the spider vibration receptor , 1959 .

[3]  C. Walcott The Effect of the Web on Vibration Sensitivity in the Spider, Achaearanea Tepidariorum (KOCH) , 1963 .

[4]  Reactions of Orb‐Weaving Spiders (Argiopidae) to Airborne Sounds , 1966 .

[5]  David G. Jones,et al.  Vibration and Shock in Damped Mechanical Systems , 1968 .

[6]  Rudolph M. Langer,et al.  Elementary Physics and Spider Webs , 1969 .

[7]  P. Buchhave Laser Doppler vibration measurements using variable frequency shift , 1975 .

[8]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SPIDER'S SILK AND THEIR ROLE IN THE DESIGN OF ORB-WEBS , 1976 .

[9]  Robert W. Work,et al.  The Force-Elongation Behavior of Web Fibers and Silks Forcibly Obtained from Orb-Web-Spinning Spiders , 1976 .

[10]  S. A. Wainwright,et al.  Mechanical Design in Organisms , 2020 .

[11]  Robert W. Work,et al.  Dimensions, Birefringences, and Force-Elongation Behavior of Major and Minor Ampullate Silk Fibers from Orb-Web-Spinning Spiders—The Effects of Wetting on these Properties , 1977 .

[12]  John Theodore Houghton,et al.  The Physics of Atmospheres , 1977 .

[13]  Jerome J. Sheehy Optimum detection of signals in non‐Gaussian noise , 1978 .

[14]  Iain G. Main,et al.  Vibrations and Waves in Physics , 1985 .

[15]  A. Finck,et al.  BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE TO WHOLE-BODY VIBRATIO N IN THE ORB-WEAVER ARANEUS SERICATUS CLERCK (ARANEAE : ARANEIDAE ) , 1979 .

[16]  J. Burgess Web-signal processing for tolerance and group predation in the social spider Mallos gregalis simon , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  R. Altes Detection, estimation, and classification with spectrograms , 1980 .

[18]  H. Markl,et al.  Vibration signal transmission in spider orb webs. , 1981, Science.

[19]  D. K. Hoffmaster Responses of the spider Argiope aurantia to low frequency phasic and continuous vibrations , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  F. Barth Chapter 3 Spiders and Vibratory Signals: Sensory Reception and Behavioral Significance , 1982 .

[21]  C. Frohlich,et al.  Transmission and attenuation of vibration in orb spider webs , 1982 .

[22]  A. J. Moffat,et al.  A functional explanation of top-bottom asymmetry in vertical orbwebs , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  H. Markl,et al.  Transmission of vibration in a spider's web , 1986 .

[24]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  Reaction time and stimulus frequency in prey localization in the surface-feeding fishAplocheilus lineatus , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[25]  W. Mitch Masters,et al.  Vibrations in the orbwebs of Nuctenea sclopetaria (Araneidae) , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  F. Barth,et al.  Spider vibration receptors: Threshold curves of individual slits in the metatarsal lyriform organ , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[27]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Biophysics of the ensiferan ear , 1978, Journal of Comparative Physiology.

[28]  Fr. Liesenfeld Untersuchungen am Netz und über den Erschütterungssinn von Zygiella x-notata (Cl.) (Araneidae) , 1956, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[29]  R. Suter Cyclosa turbinata (Araneae, Araneidae): Prey discrimination via web-borne vibrations , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  Johannes Bohnenberger Matched transfer characteristics of single units in a compound slit sense organ , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[31]  K. Brown Foraging ecology and niche partitioning in orb-weaving spiders , 1981, Oecologia.

[32]  Jochen Speck,et al.  Vibration sensitivity of pretarsal slit sensilla in the spider leg , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[33]  W. Nentwig The prey of web-building spiders compared with feeding experiments (Araneae: Araneidae, Linyphiidae, pholcidae, Agelenidae) , 2004, Oecologia.

[34]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  Vibratory signals and prey capture in orb-weaving spiders (Zygiella x-notata, Nephila clavipes; Araneidae) , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[35]  Horst H. Lang Surface wave discrimination between prey and nonprey by the back swimmerNotonecta glauca L. (Hemiptera, Heteroptera) , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[36]  F. Barth,et al.  The release of attack and escape behavior by vibratory stimuli in a wandering spider (Cupiennim salei keys.) , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.