Virtual bronchoscopy for evaluation of airway disease.

The data presented above indicate that VB is a novel and extremely useful modality for airway evaluation in patients who have benign and malignant disease. VB is noninvasive, with no additional radiation exposure relative to standard CT scans of the chest. Commercial software allows for the interactivity of 2D and 3D images. The ability to examine 2D and 3D anatomic detail from multiple directions enables precise assessment of intraluminal and extraluminal pathology. The authors' experience indicates that VB is a superb modality for assessing the length of airway stenoses and ascertaining airway patency distal to these lesions (Fig. 6). As such, VB has proven to be extremely useful for determining the feasibility of endobronchial procedures such as dilations, stent placements, and laser ablation of endobronchial tumors. Ferretti et al [27] observed that VB is an excellent noninvasive means for long-term monitoring of tracheobronchial stents. Furthermore, the authors have found VB useful for guiding the bronchoscopic evaluation of patients who have intermittent hemoptysis secondary to lesions in peripheral airways. The 3D anatomic detail provided by VB has proven useful for assessing the feasibility of lung-sparing procedures in patients who have limited pulmonary reserve and for sequentially evaluating treatment response in patients who have inoperable disease. Currently, the main limitation of VB pertains to its inability to evaluate the mucosal surface of the respiratory tract reliably. Although form can be detected, mucosal color, irregularity, or friability cannot be assessed. As such, VB cannot be used for routine surveillance of patients at high risk of developing airway malignancies. The development of novel aerosolized contrast agents or spectroscopic techniques that can discriminate benign versus malignant mucosal tissues might enhance the sensitivity and specificity of VB for the detection of preinvasive cancers within the respiratory tract.

[1]  W. Webb,et al.  Multidetector-row spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of thoracic diseases. , 2001, Respiratory care.

[2]  G. Colice,et al.  Comparison of computerized tomography with fiberoptic bronchoscopy in identifying endobronchial abnormalities in patients with known or suspected lung cancer. , 1985, The American review of respiratory disease.

[3]  F Thony,et al.  Benign abnormalities and carcinoid tumors of the central airways: diagnostic impact of CT bronchography. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  G. Ferretti,et al.  Helical CT with Multiplanar and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Nonneoplastic Abnormalities of the Trachea , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  Calum MacAulay,et al.  Innovative molecular and imaging approaches for the detection of lung cancer and its precursor lesions , 2002, Oncogene.

[6]  J. Putnam New and evolving treatment methods for pulmonary metastases. , 2002, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  Ronald M Summers,et al.  CT virtual bronchoscopy of the central airways in patients with Wegener's granulomatosis. , 2002, Chest.

[8]  G. R. Ferretti,et al.  Central airway stenoses: preliminary results of spiral-CT-generated virtual bronchoscopy simulations in 29 patients , 1997, European Radiology.

[9]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Improved virtual bronchoscopy using a multislice helical CT scanner , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[10]  A J Aschoff,et al.  Comparison of real-time virtual and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in patients with bronchial carcinoma: opportunities and limitations. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  P. Costello,et al.  Spiral CT with multiplanar and three-dimensional reconstructions accurately predicts tracheobronchial pathology. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  G. Ferretti,et al.  Follow-up after stent insertion in the tracheobronchial tree: role of helical computed tomography in comparison with fiberoptic bronchoscopy , 2003, European Radiology.

[13]  D J Vining,et al.  Tracheobronchial tree: three-dimensional spiral CT with bronchoscopic perspective. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  G. Halter,et al.  Comparison of virtual and fiberoptic bronchoscopy. , 1998, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[15]  R. Summers,et al.  Comparative evaluation of super high-resolution CT scan and virtual bronchoscopy for the detection of tracheobronchial malignancies. , 2003, Chest.

[16]  R. Summers,et al.  Virtual bronchoscopy for evaluation of malignant tumors of the thorax. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  J. Remy,et al.  Volume rendering of the tracheobronchial tree: clinical evaluation of bronchographic images. , 1998, Radiology.

[18]  D. McCauley,et al.  Comparison of CT and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the evaluation of bronchial disease. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  D J Vining,et al.  Evaluation of Airway Obstruction Using Virtual Endoscopy , 2000, The Laryngoscope.

[20]  Chin-Tu Chen,et al.  Medical Imaging 2002: Physiology and Function from Multidimensional Images , 2002 .

[21]  Martin Sonnenschein,et al.  Multidetector CT virtual bronchoscopy to grade tracheobronchial stenosis. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  E. Pacht,et al.  Complications of fiberoptic bronchoscopy at a university hospital. , 1995, Chest.

[23]  T. Welte,et al.  Comparison of three-dimensional virtual endoscopy with bronchoscopy in patients with oesophageal carcinoma infiltrating the tracheobronchial tree. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  P M Silverman,et al.  Helical (spiral) CT of the upper airway with three-dimensional imaging: technique and clinical assessment. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  M. C. Sneller Wegener's granulomatosis. , 1995, JAMA.