Multi-Objective Building Envelope Optimization through a Life Cycle Assessment Approach

This work describes a methodology for the identification of the optimal features for the envelope of a residential building. The optimization process allows minimizing operating energy consumption, investment costs and life cycle energy and environmental embodied impacts. A dynamic model for the estimation of building energy consumption during its use phase has been employed, while literature data were adopted for embodied energy and global warming potential impacts. The considered variables refer to the envelope of the building, i.e. external walls and roof insulation and external walls thermal mass. The model was obtained combining EnergyPlus building energy simulator and MOBO, a versatile freeware that allows running the optimization of building features. The optimization was solved using NSGA II, a widespread adopted multi-objective genetic algorithm available in MOBO. The same building was simulated in two different climatic zones, namely Palermo (Italy) and Copenhagen (Denmark), in order to compare differences attained in the optimal solutions. The case study shows that the adoption of glass wool for the roof insulation and small concrete layers for external walls are to be preferred, providing optimal results in both climates. The present work was developed within the framework of IEA EBC Annex 72.

[1]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  Implementing multi objective genetic algorithm for life cycle carbon footprint and life cycle cost minimisation: A building refurbishment case study , 2016 .

[2]  M. Cellura,et al.  Life cycle energy performances and environmental impacts of a prefabricated building module , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[3]  Eleonora Riva Sanseverino,et al.  A review on optimization and cost-optimal methodologies in low-energy buildings design and environmental considerations , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[4]  M. Davies Building Heat Transfer , 2004 .

[5]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Optimization in Engineering , 2017 .

[6]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Refurbishment Scenario to Shift Nearly Net ZEBs Toward Net ZEB Target: An Italian Case Study , 2013 .

[7]  Michaël Kummert,et al.  CONDUCTION TRANSFER FUNCTIONS IN TRNSYS MULTIZONE BUILDING MODEL: CURRENT IMPLEMENTATION, LIMITATIONS AND POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS , 2012 .

[8]  E. Sanseverino,et al.  Smart multi-carrier energy system: Optimised energy management and investment analysis , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON).

[9]  A. Monti,et al.  Smart district energy optimization of flexible energy units for the integration of local energy storage , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2017 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe).

[10]  Graham Ault,et al.  Multi-objective planning of distributed energy resources: A review of the state-of-the-art , 2010 .

[11]  Drury B. Crawley,et al.  EnergyPlus: Energy simulation program , 2000 .

[12]  Vincenzo Antonucci,et al.  Integration of Building Simulation and Life Cycle Assessment: A TRNSYS Application , 2016 .

[13]  Anh Tuan Nguyen,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for solving nearly-zero-energy-building design problems , 2016 .

[14]  Mohamed Hamdy,et al.  Mobo A New Software For Multi-objective Building Performance Optimization , 2013, Building Simulation Conference Proceedings.

[15]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[16]  DebK.,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[17]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..