Gender differences in visuospatial planning: An eye movements study

Gender studies report a male advantage in several visuospatial abilities. Only few studies however, have evaluated differences in visuospatial planning behaviour with regard to gender. This study was aimed at exploring whether gender may affect the choice of cognitive strategies in a visuospatial planning task and, if oculomotor measures could assist in disentangling the cognitive processes involved. A computerised task based on the travelling salesperson problem paradigm, the Maps test, was used to investigate these issues. Participants were required to optimise time and space of a path travelling among a set of sub-goals in a spatially constrained environment. Behavioural results suggest that there are no gender differences in the initial visual processing of the stimuli, but rather during the execution of the plan, with males showing a shorter execution time and a higher path length optimisation than females. Males often showed changes of heuristics during the execution while females seemed to prefer a constant strategy. Moreover, a better performance in behavioural and oculomotor measures seemed to suggest that males are more able than females in either the optimisation of spatial features or the realisation of the planned scheme. Despite inconclusive findings, the results support previous research and provide insight into the level of cognitive processing involved in navigation and planning tasks, with regard to the influence of gender.

[1]  Eugene L. Lawler,et al.  Traveling Salesman Problem , 2016 .

[2]  Margarete Delazer,et al.  Sex differences in cognitive functions , 2003 .

[3]  J. Duncan.  Disorganisation of behaviour after frontal lobe damage , 1986 .

[4]  P. Rossini,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in visuo-spatial planning: a repetitive TMS study , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  H. A. Witkin.  Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. , 1950, Journal of personality.

[6]  C. Lawton,et al.  Gender Differences in Wayfinding Strategies and Anxiety About Wayfinding: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2002 .

[7]  R. Sternberg.  Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[8]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotional reactions in children: verbal, physiological, and behavioral responses to affective pictures. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[9]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[10]  E. Coluccia,et al.  Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review , 2004 .

[11]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[12]  C. Lawton,et al.  Gender and Regional Differences in Spatial Referents Used in Direction Giving , 2001 .

[13]  Wen-chih Chang,et al.  Gender differences in relation to wayfinding strategies, navigational support design, and wayfinding task difficulty , 2009 .

[14]  D. Kimura,et al.  Sex differences in route-learning , 1993 .

[15]  Caroline Knight,et al.  Ecological validity of a simplified version of the multiple errands shopping test. , 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS.

[16]  S. Huettel,et al.  Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  C. Lawton.  Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety , 1994 .

[18]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Shin Murakoshi,et al.  Use of Knowledge and Heuristics for Wayfinding in an Artificial Environment , 2000 .

[20]  D. Saucier,et al.  Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies? , 2002, Behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[22]  A. Joshi,et al.  The traveling salesman problem: A hierarchical model , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Heuristic rules for sequential spatial decisions , 1992 .

[24]  Demis Basso,et al.  The role of the feedforward paradigm in cognitive psychology , 2006, Cognitive Processing.

[25]  J. Grafman,et al.  Are the frontal lobes implicated in “planning” functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  G. Fink,et al.  Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  I. Silverman,et al.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN SPATIAL BEHAVIORS: APPLICATIONS TO ROUTE LEARNING , 1996 .

[28]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[29]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  A Cognitive-Process Taxonomy for Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 2004 .

[30]  T. Shallice.  Specific impairments of planning. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[31]  M. Van der Linden,et al.  Gender differences in two decision-making tasks in a community sample of adolescents , 2006 .

[32]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  M. Takeda,et al.  Effect of mental activity in problem solving on eye movements , 1976 .

[34]  A. Herlitz,et al.  Sex differences in episodic memory: Minimal influence of estradiol , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  Carl P. T. Jackson,et al.  Sex differences in a virtual water maze: An eye tracking and pupillometry study , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[36]  D. Kimura.  Sex and cognition , 1999 .

[37]  Mark E. Slama,et al.  Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.) , 2005 .

[38]  Darren R Gitelman,et al.  ILAB: A program for postexperimental eye movement analysis , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[39]  D. Buss.  Evolutionary Psychology -- The New Science of the Mind , 1998 .

[40]  Stacy Rilea.  A lateralization of function approach to sex differences in spatial ability: A reexamination , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[41]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Representations: Definitions, Distinctions, and Interconnections , 1998, Spatial Cognition.

[42]  Anna S. Law,et al.  The impact of secondary tasks on multi-tasking in a virtual environment. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[43]  Wilfried Brauer,et al.  Spatial Cognition III , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[44]  J. Jonides,et al.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[45]  Barr and Feigenbaum Edward A. Avron,et al.  The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence , 1981 .

[46]  Alexander Klippel,et al.  Human factors in GIScience laboratory at the Pennsylvania State University , 2009, Cognitive Processing.

[47]  R. Byrne.  Planning meals: Problem-solving on a real data-base , 1977, Cognition.

[48]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[49]  Demis Basso,et al.  Planning times during traveling salesman's problem: Differences between closed head injury and normal subjects , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[50]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. , 1999 .

[51]  J. M. Dabbs,et al.  Spatial Ability, Navigation Strategy, and Geographic Knowledge Among Men and Women , 1998 .

[52]  C. Freksa,et al.  Spatial Cognition, An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge , 1998 .

[53]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  T. Ormerod,et al.  Human performance on the traveling salesman problem , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Modeling strategy shifts in a problem-solving task , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  Thora Tenbrink,et al.  The verbalization of multiple strategies in a variant of the traveling salesperson problem , 2009, Cognitive Processing.

[57]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Planning , 1979, Cogn. Sci..