Seeded Laplacian in sparse subspace for hyperspectral image classification

Sparse Representation (SR) has received an increasing amount of interest in recent years. It aims to find the sparsest representation of each data capturing high-level semantics among the linear combinations of the base sets in a given dictionary. In order to further improve the classification performance, the joint SR that incorporates interpixel correlation information of neighborhoods has been proposed for image pixel classification. However, joint SR method yields high computational cost. To improve the performance and computation efficiency of SR and joint SR, we propose a seeded Laplacian based on sparse representation (SeedLSR) framework for hyperspectral image classification, where a hypergraph Laplacian explicitly takes into account the local manifold structure of the hyperspectral pixel in a spatial-type weighted graph. Given the training data in a dictionary, SeedLSR algorithm firstly finds the sparse representation of hyperspectral pixels, which is used to define the spectral-type affinity matrix of an undirected graph. Then, using the training data as user-defined seeds, the final classification can be obtained by solving the combination of spectral and spatial hypergraph Laplacian quadratic problem. To assess the efficiency of the proposed SeedLSR method, experiments were performed on the scene data under daylight illumination. Compared with SR algorithm, the classification results vary smoothly along the geodesics of the data manifold.

[1]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing , 2009 .

[2]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[3]  Aydin Akan,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral images using mixture of probabilistic PCA models , 2016, 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[4]  James E. Fowler,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Gaussian Mixture Models and Markov Random Fields , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[5]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Simultaneous Joint Sparsity Model for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Mehdi Mokhtarzade,et al.  Classification of Hyperspectral Images Using Subspace Projection Feature Space , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[7]  Qi Tian,et al.  Contextual Exemplar Classifier-Based Image Representation for Classification , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[8]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Sparse Representation for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  Liang-Tien Chia,et al.  Laplacian Sparse Coding, Hypergraph Laplacian Sparse Coding, and Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Anne H. Schistad Solberg,et al.  Structured Gaussian Components for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Processing for Automatic Target Detection Applications , 2003 .

[12]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Advances in Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Images , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Learning Discriminative Sparse Representations for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[14]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Sparse Kernel-Based Ensemble Learning With Fully Optimized Kernel Parameters for Hyperspectral Classification Problems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Nicolas Courty,et al.  Joint Anomaly Detection and Spectral Unmixing for Planetary Hyperspectral Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Dictionary-Based Sparse Representation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  Koray Kayabol.  Bayesian Gaussian mixture model for spatial-spectral classification of hyperspectral images , 2015, 2015 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[20]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Kernel Subspace Target Detectors for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2007, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[21]  Fuchun Sun,et al.  A Fast and Robust Sparse Approach for Hyperspectral Data Classification Using a Few Labeled Samples , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING 1 Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Image Segmentation Using S , 2022 .