Three-year Results with the Cementless Bicontact total Hip Arthroplasty Femoral Component
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Hungerford,et al. The rationale for cementless total hip replacement. , 1993, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.
[2] B. Wroblewski. Cementless versus cemented total hip arthroplasty. A scientific controversy? , 1993, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.
[3] J. Callaghan,et al. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. Results after five to seven years in a prospective study. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[4] W H Harris,et al. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[5] C. Engh,et al. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[6] C. Engh,et al. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[7] H. Amstutz,et al. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[8] L. Riley,et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[9] P. D. Wilson,et al. Total hip replacement with fixation by acrylic cement. A preliminary study of 100 consecutive McKee-Farrar prosthetic replacements. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.