Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.

The imaging performance of an amorphous selenium (a-Se) flat-panel detector for digital fluoroscopy was experimentally evaluated using the spatial frequency dependent modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE). These parameters were investigated at beam qualities and exposures within the range typical of gastrointestinal fluoroscopic imaging (approximately 0.1 - 10 microR, 75 kV). The investigation does not take into consideration the detector cover, which in clinical use will lower the DQE measured here by its percent attenuation. The MTF was found to be less than the expected aperture response and the NPS was not white which together indicate presampling blurring. The cause of this blurring was attributed to charge trapping at the interface between two different layers of the a-Se. The effect on the DQE was also consistent with presampling blur, which reduces the aliasing in the NPS and thereby reduces the spatial frequency dependence of the DQE. (The DQE was independent of spatial frequency from 0.12 to 0.73 mm(-1) due to antialiasing of the NPS.) Moreover, the first zero of the measured MTF and the aperture response appeared at the same spatial frequency (6.66 mm(-1) for a pixel of 150 microm). Hence, the geometric fill factor (77%) was increased to an effective fill factor of 99 +/- 1%. A large scale ( approximately 32 pixels) correlation in the noise due to the configuration of the readout electronics caused increased noise power in the gate line NPS at low spatial frequency (< 0.1 mm(-1)). The DQE (f = 0) was exposure independent over a large range of exposures but became exposure dependent at low exposures due to the electronic noise.

[1]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: determination of Swank factor by pulse height spectroscopy. , 1998, Medical physics.

[2]  J. Boone,et al.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. , 1997, Medical physics.

[3]  C E Ravin,et al.  Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. , 1999, Radiology.

[4]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Direct conversion detectors: the effect of incomplete charge collection on detective quantum efficiency. , 2002, Medical physics.

[5]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: inherent spatial resolution. , 1995, Medical physics.

[6]  P. Greer,et al.  Evaluation of an algorithm for the assessment of the MTF using an edge method. , 2000, Medical physics.

[7]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  C E Ravin,et al.  Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[9]  G. Lubberts,et al.  Random Noise Produced by X-Ray Fluorescent Screens* , 1968 .

[10]  J T Dobbins,et al.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. , 1995, Medical physics.

[11]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  A R Cowen,et al.  Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector. , 2001, Medical physics.

[13]  P. Judy,et al.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. , 1976, Medical physics.

[14]  M. Z. Kabir,et al.  Dependence of the detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive x-ray image detectors on charge transport parameters and exposure: Application to a-Se , 2002 .

[15]  P. Granfors,et al.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[16]  Richard Aufrichtig,et al.  Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications. , 2003, Medical physics.

[17]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology. , 1995, Medical physics.

[18]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Conditioning data for calculation of the modulation transfer function. , 2003, Medical physics.

[19]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: geometrical and effective fill factors. , 1998, Medical physics.

[20]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Comparison of PbI2 and HgI2 for direct detection active matrix x-ray image sensors , 2002 .

[21]  Martin Choquette,et al.  Progress report on the performance of real-time selenium flat-panel detectors for direct x-ray imaging , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector. , 2003, Medical physics.