Comparing Mathematics and Science Achievement of Students from Schools with PLTW versus Schools without PLTW

Project Lead the Way (PLTW) has been developed to provide a rigorous engineering curriculum that allows high school students to learn about advanced engineering concepts and their application in various STEM-related subjects. The present study was designed to examine the effectiveness of PLTW curriculum on high school students’ mathematics and science achievement. Mathematics and science scores of students attending PLTW schools and students attending non-PLTW schools were compared using student data gathered from the 2016 State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STARR). In the present study, T-STEM schools were removed to avoid the impact of other STEM curricula on participants’ mathematics and science achievement. Scores on the mathematics STARR test were gathered from 804 students in PLTW schools and 805 students in non-PLTW schools, and scores from the science STARR test were gathered from 800 students in PLTW schools and 800 students in non-PLTW schools. The results indicated that the mean of students’ mathematics achievement in PLTW schools was higher than the mean of students’ mathematics achievement in non-PLTW schools ($d = {0.400, 95{\%} }\, CI =$[0.300, 0.498]). The mean of students’ science achievement in PLTW schools was higher than the mean of students’ science achievement in non-PLTW schools ($d = {0.197, 95{\%} }\, CI =$ [0.099, 0.295]).

[1]  J. P. Overschelde,et al.  Project Lead the Way Students More Prepared for Higher Education. , 2013 .

[2]  Todd R. Kelley Cognitive Processes of Students Participating in Engineering-focused Design Instruction , 2008 .

[3]  D G Oreopoulos,et al.  Our Impact , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Muhittin Yilmaz,et al.  Hands-On Summer Camp to Attract K–12 Students to Engineering Fields , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[5]  Elliott Ostler,et al.  21st Century STEM Education: A Tactical Model for Long-Range Success , 2012 .

[6]  Howard L Fleischman,et al.  Science Literacy , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[7]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[8]  Jay B. Labov,et al.  STEM Learning Is Everywhere: Summary of a Convocation on Building Learning Systems , 2014 .

[9]  Robert M. Capraro,et al.  STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach , 2013 .

[10]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research , 2014 .

[11]  Robert M. Capraro,et al.  Comparing students' mathematics achievement by their school types: Inclusive STEM schools that implemented PLTW curriculum with inclusive STEM schools that did not implement PLTW , 2015, 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[12]  G. Adelson,et al.  Project Lead The Way - A model program for initiating, funding and maintaining a successful pre-engineering program in the nation's high schools , 1998, FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214).

[13]  Scott Slough,et al.  Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? an Introduction to STEM Project-Based Learning , 2013 .

[14]  Brandon R. Martin Factors influencing the self-efficacy of Black high school students enrolled in PLTW pre-engineering courses , 2011 .

[15]  Shi-Jer Lou,et al.  Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment , 2013 .

[16]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  Pre‐College Engineering Studies: An Investigation of the Relationship Between Pre‐college Engineering Studies and Student Achievement in Science and Mathematics , 2010 .

[17]  M. Sanders STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania , 2009 .

[18]  David Kastberg,et al.  Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), 2003. NCES 2005-005. , 2004 .