On observing another person’s actions: Influences of observed inhibition and errors

It was investigated whether an observer would simulate another person’s inhibitory and error processes. Two participants sitting next to each other performed a stop signal task in which they occasionally had to try and inhibit their response when indicated to do so by a stop signal. They could either successfully stop the response or fail to stop and, thereby, make an error. An aftereffect of the other person’s successful action inhibition and error was obtained: The participants became slower and more accurate when they observed the other person make an error on the previous trial and when they observed a successful stop. The results suggest that observing another person successfully inhibit an action or make an error evokes processes similar to those that occur when these behaviors are produced.

[1]  R. Klein,et al.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[3]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[4]  Michael G. H. Coles,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, selection for action, and error processing , 2004 .

[5]  S. Tipper,et al.  Inhibitory Mechanisms of Neural and Cognitive Control: Applications to Selective Attention and Sequential Action , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[6]  P. Rabbitt.  Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  M. W. van der Molen,et al.  Differential involvement of the aterior cingulated cortex in performance monitoring during a stop-signal task , 2005 .

[10]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The motor theory of social cognition: a critique , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[13]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Evidence for an Error Monitoring Deficit in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder , 2004, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[14]  G. Logan.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[15]  R. Miall,et al.  A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  P. Liddle,et al.  External Behavior Monitoring Mirrors Internal Behavior Monitoring , 2005 .

[17]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Tracy L. Taylor,et al.  The Interplay of Stop Signal Inhibition and Inhibition of Return , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  M. Jeannerod.  Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  W. Prinz,et al.  How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[28]  S. Tipper,et al.  Implicit action encoding influences personal-trait judgments , 2007, Cognition.

[29]  H. Garavan,et al.  Dissociable Executive Functions in the Dynamic Control of Behavior: Inhibition, Error Detection, and Correction , 2002, NeuroImage.

[30]  Martina Rieger,et al.  Inhibitory after‐effects in the stop signal paradigm , 1999 .

[31]  U. Castiello.  Understanding other people's actions: intention and attention. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[34]  J. Decety,et al.  From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[35]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[36]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Canceling planned action: an FMRI study of countermanding saccades. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  G. Logan,et al.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Bryan Rodgers,et al.  What does a Man do after he Makes an Error? An Analysis of Response Programming , 1977 .