Computational growth model of breast microcalcification clusters in simulated mammographic environments

BACKGROUND When screening for breast cancer, the radiological interpretation of mammograms is a difficult task, particularly when classifying precancerous growth such as microcalcifications (MCs). Biophysical modeling of benign vs. malignant growth of MCs in simulated mammographic backgrounds may improve characterization of these structures METHODS A mathematical model based on crystal growth rules for calcium oxide (benign) and hydroxyapatite (malignant) was used in conjunction with simulated mammographic backgrounds, which were generated by fractional Brownian motion of varying roughness and quantified by the Hurst exponent to mimic tissue of varying density. Simulated MC clusters were compared by fractal dimension, average circularity of individual MCs, average number of MCs per cluster, and average cluster area. RESULTS Benign and malignant clusters were distinguishable by average circularity, average number of MCs per cluster, and average cluster area with p<0.01 across all Hurst exponent values considered. Clusters were distinguishable by fractal dimension with p<0.05 in low Hurst exponent environments. As the Hurst exponent increased (tissue density increased) benign and malignant MCs became indistinguishable by fractal dimension. CONCLUSIONS The fractal dimension of MCs changes with breast tissue density, which suggests tissue environment plays a role in regulating MC growth. Benign and malignant MCs are distinguishable in all types of tissue by shape, size, and area, which is consistent with findings in the literature. These results may help to better understand the effects of the tissue environment on tumor progression, and improve classification of MCs in mammograms via computer-aided diagnosis.

[1]  A. Giuliani,et al.  Fractal analysis in a systems biology approach to cancer. , 2011, Seminars in cancer biology.

[2]  S. Fields,et al.  Can the size of microcalcifications predict malignancy of clusters at mammography? , 2002, Academic radiology.

[3]  Fahima Nekka,et al.  Morphological Analysis of H I Features. II. Wavelet-based Multifractal Formalism , 2006 .

[4]  A. Arneodo,et al.  Perinuclear distribution of heterochromatin in developing C. elegans embryos , 2010, Chromosome Research.

[5]  Kevin Judd,et al.  ESTIMATING DIMENSIONS WITH CONFIDENCE , 1991 .

[6]  J. White Breast density and cancer risk: what is the relationship? , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  Alain Arneodo,et al.  Wavelet-Based 3D Reconstruction of Microcalcification Clusters from Two Mammographic Views: New Evidence That Fractal Tumors Are Malignant and Euclidean Tumors Are Benign , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Radi Mj,et al.  Calcium oxalate crystals in breast biopsies. An overlooked form of microcalcification associated with benign breast disease. , 1989 .

[9]  S. McWeeney,et al.  Cancer stem cell tumor model reveals invasive morphology and increased phenotypical heterogeneity. , 2010, Cancer research.

[10]  Gavin S. P. Miller,et al.  The definition and rendering of terrain maps , 1986, SIGGRAPH.

[11]  H Pujol,et al.  Isolated clustered microcalcifications: diagnostic value of mammography--series of 400 cases with surgical verification. , 1994, Radiology.

[12]  Chelsi J. Snow,et al.  Time-Lapse Analysis and Mathematical Characterization Elucidate Novel Mechanisms Underlying Muscle Morphogenesis , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[13]  J. C. Fu,et al.  Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[14]  Alain Arneodo,et al.  A wavelet-based method for multifractal image analysis: From theoretical concepts to experimental applications , 2003 .

[15]  D. Engelman,et al.  Image analysis of soft-tissue in-growth and attachment into highly porous alumina ceramic foam metals. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  G. Joncas,et al.  Morphological analysis of H i features – III. Metric space technique revisited , 2010 .

[17]  S S Cross,et al.  FRACTALS IN PATHOLOGY , 1997, The Journal of pathology.

[18]  Yojana V Nalawade Evaluation of breast calcifications , 2009, The Indian journal of radiology & imaging.

[19]  Shannon M. Mumenthaler,et al.  Modeling Multiscale Necrotic and Calcified Tissue Biomechanics in Cancer Patients: Application to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) , 2013 .

[20]  C. Mandal,et al.  A Molecular View of Pathological Microcalcification in Breast Cancer , 2016, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[21]  A. Arneodo,et al.  Revisiting the physical processes of vapodeposited thin gold films on chemically modified glass by atomic force and surface plasmon microscopies , 2009 .

[22]  B. Jansen,et al.  High-resolution 3D micro-CT imaging of breast microcalcifications: a preliminary analysis , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[23]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[24]  D. Batuski,et al.  MULTI-SCALE MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SDSS DR5 SURVEY USING THE METRIC SPACE TECHNIQUE , 2008, 0812.0398.

[25]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.

[26]  Olli Nevalainen,et al.  Algorithmic 3D simulation of breast calcifications for digital mammography , 2001, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[27]  M. Morgan,et al.  Microcalcifications Associated with Breast Cancer: An Epiphenomenon or Biologically Significant Feature of Selected Tumors? , 2005, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[28]  V. Tazzoli,et al.  The crystal structures of whewellite and weddellite; re-examination and comparison , 1980 .

[29]  A. Arneodo,et al.  A wavelet-based method for multifractal image analysis. I. Methodology and test applications on isotropic and anisotropic random rough surfaces , 2000 .

[30]  Wagner Coelho A. Pereira,et al.  Evaluating geodesic active contours in microcalcifications segmentation on mammograms , 2015, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[31]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test , 2015, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[32]  Ayman AbuBaker,et al.  Mammogram Image Size Reduction Using 16-8 bit Conversion Technique , 2006 .

[33]  M. L. Martins,et al.  Reaction-diffusion model for the growth of avascular tumor. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  F. Nekka,et al.  Morphological Analysis of H I Features. I. Metric Space Technique , 2004 .

[35]  S. Jonathan Chapman,et al.  Mathematical Models of Avascular Tumor Growth , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[36]  Mario Vento,et al.  Automatic classification of clustered microcalcifications by a multiple expert system , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[37]  Irini Reljin,et al.  Adaptation of multifractal analysis to segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammograms , 2006 .

[38]  Chiara Adriana Pistolese,et al.  Microcalcifications in breast cancer: an active phenomenon mediated by epithelial cells with mesenchymal characteristics , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[39]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Optimized generation of high resolution breast anthropomorphic software phantoms. , 2012, Medical physics.

[40]  Alain Arneodo,et al.  WAVELET-BASED MULTIFRACTAL FORMALISM TO ASSIST IN DIAGNOSIS IN DIGITIZED MAMMOGRAMS , 2011 .

[41]  Alain Arneodo,et al.  Automated Detection of Coronal Loops Using a Wavelet Transform Modulus Maxima Method , 2010, 1002.3107.

[42]  E. Weibel,et al.  Fractals in Biology and Medicine , 1994 .

[43]  Elizabeth A Rafferty,et al.  Digital mammography: novel applications. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[44]  J W Baish,et al.  Fractals and cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.

[45]  A. Arneodo,et al.  Chromosome territories have a highly nonspherical morphology and nonrandom positioning , 2007, Chromosome Research.

[46]  D R Dance,et al.  Validation of simulation of calcifications for observer studies in digital mammography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study , 2010, European Radiology.

[48]  A. S. Posner,et al.  Crystal Structure of Hydroxyapatite , 1964, Nature.

[49]  Bassett Lw Mammographic analysis of calcifications. , 1992 .

[50]  Michael F. Barnsley,et al.  Fractals everywhere , 1988 .

[51]  E A Sickles,et al.  Mammographic features of "early" breast cancer. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[52]  David Gur,et al.  Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.