An investigation of undergraduates' transformational problem solving strategies: cognitive/metacognitive processes as predictors of holistic/analytic strategies

Recent years have seen increasing interest in the role of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. The study described in this paper explored problem solving strategies used by undergraduates. Furthermore, cognitive/metacognitive processes are predicted each of holistic and analytic strategies. Educational sciences students (n=178) were asked to talk/think aloud while solving two constructed response transformational problems. The protocols were transcribed and analysed, revealing that the cohort used nine strategies. The results showed that a holistic strategy was predicted by five cognitive/metacognitive processes, two of which were suppressors; whilst an analytic strategy was predicted by four cognitive/metacognitive processes, three of which were suppressors.

[1]  V. Yzerbyt,et al.  Cognition and metacognition , 1998 .

[2]  Annette F. Gourgey,et al.  Self-Concept and Metacognition in Ethnic Minorities , 1996 .

[3]  M. Montague,et al.  The Effects of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities , 1992, Journal of learning disabilities.

[4]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Cognition: Theory and Applications , 1982 .

[5]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies , 2013 .

[6]  M. G. Jones,et al.  An Investigation of African American Students' Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1998 .

[7]  John Karat,et al.  A model of problem solving with incomplete constraint knowledge , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  John H. Chilcott.  Where Are You Coming From and Where Are You Going? The Reporting of Ethnographic Research , 1987 .

[9]  E. Pedhazur.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction , 1982 .

[10]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes , 1997 .

[11]  Philip Wong.  Metacognition in Mathematical Problem Solving , 1992 .

[12]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research , 1984 .

[13]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[14]  B. Kenneth,et al.  MACRO COMPARATIVE RESEARCH METHODS , 1993 .

[15]  Y. Bradshaw,et al.  Foreign Capital Penetration, State Intervention, and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa , 1990 .

[16]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[17]  R. Skemp.  The psychology of learning mathematics , 1979 .

[18]  M. Lawson,et al.  Knowledge Connectedness in Geometry Problem Solving. , 2000 .

[19]  S. Davies.  Memory and Planning Processes in Solutions to Well-Structured Problems , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  Thomas J. Shuell,et al.  Phases of Meaningful Learning , 1990 .

[21]  Randy Elliot Bennett,et al.  Three Response Types for Broadening the Conception of Mathematical Problem Solving in Computerized Tests , 1998 .

[22]  Carol S. Weinstein,et al.  Effective Teaching Strategies: Lessons from Research and Practice , 2003 .

[23]  Y. Benito.  Metacognitive Ability and Cognitive Strategies to Solve Maths and Transformation Problems , 2000 .

[24]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Frank K. Lester,et al.  Musings about Mathematical Problem-Solving Research: 1970-1994. , 1994 .

[26]  B. Beyer.  Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking , 1987 .

[27]  Identification of strategies used in solving transformational geometry problems , 1994 .

[28]  D. John,et al.  User Performance with Audio: The effect of subjects' cognitive styles , 2002 .