Contrarotating Open Rotor Operation for Improved Aerodynamics and Noise at Takeoff

The contra-rotating open rotor is, once again, being considered as an alternative to the advanced turbofan to address the growing pressure to cut aviation fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. One of the key challenges is meeting community noise targets at takeoff. Previous open rotor designs are subject to poor efficiency at takeoff due to the presence of large regions of separated flow on the blades as a result of the high incidence needed to achieve the required thrust. This is a consequence of the fixed rotor rotational speed constraint typical of variable pitch propellers. Within the study described in this paper, an improved operation is proposed to improve performance and reduce rotorrotor interaction noise at takeoff. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculations have been performed on an open rotor rig at a range of takeoff operating conditions. These have been complemented by analytical tone noise predictions to quantify the noise benefits of the approach. The results presented show that for a given thrust, a combination of reduced rotor pitch and increased rotor rotational speed can be used to reduce the incidence onto the front rotor blades. This is shown to eliminate regions of flow separation, reduce the front rotor tip loss and reduce the downstream stream tube contraction. The wakes from the front rotor are also made wider with lower velocity defect, which is found to lead to reduced interaction tone noise. Unfortunately, the necessary increase in blade speed leads to higher relative Mach numbers, which can increase rotor alone noise. In summary, the combined CFD and aero-acoustic analysis in this paper shows how careful operation of an open rotor at takeoff, with moderate levels of re-pitch and speed increase, can lead to improved front rotor efficiency as well as appreciably lower overall noise across all directivities. Copyright © 2011 by ASME.

[1]  S. A. Watson,et al.  A computer program for estimating the aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 16-series airfoils , 1983 .

[2]  R. Haimes,et al.  On the velocity gradient tensor and fluid feature extraction , 1999 .

[3]  D. C. McCormick,et al.  A Study of the Leading Edge Vortex and Tip Vortex on Prop-Fan Blades , 1987 .

[4]  C. Rohrbach,et al.  Benefits of blade sweep for advanced turboprops , 1986 .

[5]  R. K. Amiet,et al.  High frequency thin-airfoil theory for subsonic flow , 1976 .

[6]  Cesare A. Hall,et al.  Application of a Navier-Stokes Solver to the Study of Open Rotor Aerodynamics , 2009 .

[7]  D. C. Wisler,et al.  Rotor-rotor interaction for counter-rotating fans. I - Three-dimensional flowfield measurements , 1994 .

[8]  Leroy H. Smith Unducted Fan Aerodynamic Design , 1987 .

[9]  W. Sears,et al.  Some Aspects of Non-Stationary Airfoil Theory and Its Practical Application , 1941 .

[10]  Donald J. Kee Hanson,et al.  Helicoidal Surface Theory for Harmonic Noise of Propellers in the Far Field , 1980 .

[11]  Glenn A. Mitchell Experimental aerodynamic performance of advanced 40 deg-swept 10-blade propeller model at Mach 0.6 to 0.85 , 1988 .

[12]  D. Sujudi,et al.  Identification of Swirling Flow in 3-D Vector Fields , 1995 .

[13]  Roy D. Hager,et al.  Advanced Turboprop Project , 1988 .

[14]  N. A. Cumpsty REVIEW—A Critical Review of Turbomachinery Noise , 1977 .

[15]  A. B. Parry,et al.  Modular Prediction Scheme for Blade Row Interaction Noise , 1997 .

[16]  N. A. Cumpsty,et al.  A critical review of turbomachinery noise , 1977 .

[17]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[18]  Jianping Yin,et al.  Assessment and Optimization of the Aerodynamic and Acoustic Characteristics of a Counter Rotating Open Rotor , 2010 .

[19]  Mark L. Celestina,et al.  A Numerical Simulation of the Inviscid Flow Through a Counterrotating Propeller , 1986 .

[20]  L. J. Bober,et al.  An analytical and experimental comparison of the flow field of an advanced swept turboprop , 1983 .

[21]  Zoltán S. Spakovszky,et al.  Rotor Interaction Noise in Counter-Rotating Propfan Propulsion Systems , 2010 .

[22]  T. Kirker Procurement and testing of a 1/5 scale advanced counter rotating propfan model , 1990 .

[23]  D. Crighton,et al.  Prediction of counter-rotation propeller noise , 1989 .