Ocular release of timolol from molecularly imprinted soft contact lenses.

The aim of this study was to evaluate "in vivo" the usefulness of molecular imprinting technology to obtain therapeutic soft contact lenses capable of prolonging the permanence of timolol in the precorneal area, compared to conventional contact lenses and eyedrops. Soft contact lenses (diameter 14 mm, center thickness 0.08 mm) consisted of N,N-diethylacrylamide (DEAA; main component of the matrix), methacrylic acid (MAA; functional monomer) and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA; cross-linker) were prepared by the conventional methodology (non-imprinted) or by applying a molecular imprinting technique using timolol as the template (imprinted ones). After washing and reloading, timolol release studies carried out in rabbits showed that the soft contact lenses made by the molecular imprinting method (34 microg dose) provided measurable timolol concentrations in the tear fluid for 2.0- and 3.0-fold longer than the non-imprinted contact lenses (21 microg dose) and eyedrops (doses of 34 and 125 microg), respectively. Furthermore, the area under the timolol concentration-time curve (AUC) was 3.3- and 8.7-fold greater for imprinted contact lenses than non-imprinted contact lenses and eyedrops, respectively. The timolol concentration of the eyedrops did not affect the precorneal residence time of drug significantly. On the other hand, timolol loading capacity of the contact lenses was improved by the molecular imprinting method; the sustaining of the drug levels in the tear fluid being proportional to the loading capacity of the contact lenses. These results indicate that imprinted soft contact lenses are promising drug devices able to provide greater and more sustained drug concentrations in tear fluid with lower doses than conventional eyedrops.

[1]  P. Couvreur,et al.  Liposomes Dispersed Within a Thermosensitive Gel: A New Dosage Form for Ocular Delivery of Oligonucleotides , 1998, Pharmaceutical Research.

[2]  B. Saville,et al.  Pharmacokinetic differences between ocular inserts and eyedrops. , 1996, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[3]  A. Bernkop‐Schnürch,et al.  Mucoadhesive ocular insert based on thiolated poly(acrylic acid): development and in vivo evaluation in humans. , 2003, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[4]  R. Herrero-Vanrell,et al.  Enhancement of the mydriatic response to tropicamide by bioadhesive polymers. , 2000, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[5]  C. Alvarez‐Lorenzo,et al.  The nature of backbone monomers determines the performance of imprinted soft contact lenses as timolol drug delivery systems. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[6]  J. L. Gómez-Amoza,et al.  Soft contact lenses capable of sustained delivery of timolol. , 2002, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[7]  P. Amin,et al.  Sustained ophthalmic delivery of ofloxacin from a pH triggered in situ gelling system. , 2001, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[8]  Malcolm Rowland,et al.  Clinical pharmacokinetics : concepts and applications , 1989 .

[9]  H. Sasaki,et al.  Characterization of Ocular Pharmacokinetics of Beta-Blockers Using a Diffusion Model After Instillation , 1999, Pharmaceutical Research.

[10]  A. Concheiro,et al.  Molecularly imprinted polymers for drug delivery. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[11]  J. Remon,et al.  Characterization and in vivo evaluation of ocular bioadhesive minitablets compressed at different forces. , 2003, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[12]  Thomas Gross,et al.  Enzyme Models Based on Molecularly Imprinted Polymers with Strong Esterase Activity , 1997 .

[13]  Shulin Ding RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN OPHTHALMIC DRUG DELIVERY , 1998 .

[14]  E. Rhone,et al.  Ion Exchange Resin Technology for Ophthalmic Applications , 2002 .

[15]  K. Zadnik,et al.  Twenty-five Years of Contact Lenses: The Impact on the Cornea and Ophthalmic Practice , 2000, Cornea.

[16]  Nicholas A Peppas,et al.  Molecular imprinting within hydrogels. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[17]  C. Alvarez‐Lorenzo,et al.  Timolol uptake and release by imprinted soft contact lenses made of N,N-diethylacrylamide and methacrylic acid. , 2002, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[18]  R. Gurny,et al.  Polymeric Systems for Ophthalmic Drug Delivery , 2001 .

[19]  G. Wajs,et al.  Release of therapeutic agents from contact lenses. , 1986, Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems.

[20]  H. Sasaki,et al.  In Vivo Ocular Pharmacokinetic Model for Designing Dosage Schedules and Formulations of Ophthalmic Drugs in Human , 1997 .

[21]  Multiple point adsorption in a heteropolymer gel and the Tanaka approach to imprinting: experiment and theory , 2003, cond-mat/0309334.

[22]  A. Y. Grosberg,et al.  Effect of Reversible Cross-linker, N,N‘-Bis(acryloyl)cystamine, on Calcium Ion Adsorption by Imprinted Gels , 2001 .

[23]  J. Hadgraft,et al.  Modified-Release Drug Delivery Technology , 2002 .

[24]  Pascal Furrer,et al.  Ophthalmic Drug Delivery , 2002 .