Demography and management of the invasive plant species Hypericum perforatum. II. Construction and use of an individual‐based model to predict population dynamics and the effects of management strategies

1. Hypericum perforatum , St John's wort, is an invasive weed of natural and agro-ecosystems in south-eastern Australia. In previous work we used a long-term data set to determine which plant traits and environmental factors influence population growth and persistence in this species. These results were then used to parameterize an individual-based model of the population dynamics of H. perforatum , and this model was used to make predictions about what control strategies will be most effective for populations in open and shaded sites. 2. The model was constructed using multi-level, mixed-effects statistical models of growth, survival, fecundity and damage, incorporating intrinsic plant variables, environmental variables, herbivory and spatial and temporal stochasticity. 3. We found that populations in shaded and open sites had different dynamics and responses to control strategies. Shaded populations took longer to reach infestation densities and were less affected by herbivory and reductions in survival than open populations. Open populations increased faster in response to increases in rainfall, but this was not so for shaded populations. 4. We used sensitivity testing and management simulations to predict that the most successful control strategies will involve a reduction in vegetative size in both open and shaded sites. Reductions in flowering stem size and survival in shaded and open sites, respectively, are predicted to be the next most successful strategies. Dry conditions in the austral autumn/winter adversely affect populations in both open and shaded sites. 5. Synthesis and applications . These models have enabled us to rank management strategies based on quantitative analysis of their potential effects on population size. This is an important tool not only for ecologists concerned with control of invasive species but for conservation biologists trying to understand the factors limiting a rare or endangered species.

[1]  W. Rice.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  R. Moore,et al.  The control of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L. var. angustifolium D. C.) by competing pasture plants , 1942 .

[3]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[4]  Steven I. Higgins,et al.  USING A DYNAMIC LANDSCAPE MODEL FOR PLANNING THE MANAGEMENT OF ALIEN PLANT INVASIONS , 2000 .

[5]  Andrew R. Watkinson,et al.  Density-dependence in single-species populations of plants , 1980 .

[6]  D. Briese.  Biological control of St. John's wort: past, present and future , 1997 .

[7]  Robert H. Kushler,et al.  Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-PLUS , 2003, Technometrics.

[8]  R. Groves,et al.  Population dynamics of St. John's wort in south-eastern Australia. , 1997 .

[9]  Mark Rees,et al.  Interactions between density-dependent processes population dynamics and control of an invasive plant species, Tripleurospermum perforatum (scentless chamomile) , 2001 .

[10]  M. Boersma,et al.  Control of Hypericum perforatum L. (St John's wort) by a grazing management system that uses Merino sheep. , 1999 .

[11]  A. Łomnicki.  Individual-based models and the individual-based approach to population ecology , 1999 .

[12]  D. T. Briese,et al.  Demography and management of the invasive plant species Hypericum perforatum. I. Using multi‐level mixed‐effects models for characterizing growth, survival and fecundity in a long‐term data set , 2003 .

[13]  T Coulson,et al.  The use and abuse of population viability analysis. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  Clarence J. Swanton,et al.  A mechanistic model of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) population dynamics , 1998, Weed Science.

[15]  J. D. Tomlinson,et al.  Variation in Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John's wort) in New South Wales. , 1997 .

[16]  J. Ash,et al.  The Effects of Herbivory by a Mite, Aculus hyperici, and Nutrient Deficiency on Growth in Hypericum Species , 1995 .

[17]  M. Crawley.  INSECT HERBIVORES AND PLANT POPULATION DYNAMICS , 1989 .

[18]  Andrew R. Watkinson,et al.  Modelling the Population Dynamics of an Arable Weed and Its Effects Upon Crop Yield , 1986 .

[19]  Eric Renshaw.  Modelling biological populations in space and time , 1990 .

[20]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Processes in Plant Communities , 1997 .

[21]  Janusz Uchmański,et al.  Individual variability and population regulation: an individual‐based model , 2000 .

[22]  Katriona Shea,et al.  ESTIMATING BIOCONTROL AGENT IMPACT WITH MATRIX MODELS: CARDUUS NUTANS IN NEW ZEALAND , 1998 .

[23]  M. H. Campbell.  Germination, emergence and seedling growth of Hypericum perforatum L. , 1985 .

[24]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  Modelling the effects of mink and habitat fragmentation on the water vole , 2000 .

[25]  Thomas F. Hansen,et al.  Individual variation and population dynamics , 1994 .

[26]  M. Shaw.  The population dynamics of disease on , 2022 .

[27]  J. Waage,et al.  Predictive modelling in biological control : the mango mealy bug (Rastrococcus invadens) and its parasitoids , 1991 .

[28]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology , 1992 .

[29]  D. Briese.  Biological control of weeds and fire management in protected natural areas: Are they compatible strategies? , 1996 .

[30]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  The population dynamics of an introduced tree, Sesbania punicea, in South Africa, in response to long-term damage caused by different combinations of three species of biological control agents , 1998, Oecologia.

[31]  Roger D. Cousens,et al.  Can we determine the intrinsic dynamics of real plant populations , 1995 .

[32]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  GLIM for Ecologists , 1994 .

[33]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[34]  O P Judson,et al.  The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  How Risky is Biological Control , 1996 .