Decoding visual information from a population of retinal ganglion cells.

Decoding visual information from a population of retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2336-2350, 1997. This work investigates how a time-dependent visual stimulus is encoded by the collective activity of many retinal ganglion cells. Multiple ganglion cell spike trains were recorded simultaneously from the isolated retina of the tiger salamander using a multielectrode array. The stimulus consisted of photopic, spatially uniform, temporally broadband flicker. From the recorded spike trains, an estimate was obtained of the stimulus intensity as a function of time. This was compared with the actual stimulus to assess the quality and quantity of visual information conveyed by the ganglion cell population. Two algorithms were used to decode the spike trains: an optimized linear filter in which each action potential made an additive contribution to the stimulus estimate and an artificial neural network trained by back-propagation to match spike trains with stimuli. The two methods performed indistinguishably, suggesting that most of the information about this stimulus can be extracted by linear operations on the spike trains. Individual ganglion cells conveyed information at a rate of 3.2 +/- 1.7 bits/s (mean +/- SD), with an average information content per spike of 1.6 bits. The maximal possible rate of information transmission compatible with the measured spiking statistics was 13.9 +/- 6.3 bits/s. On average, ganglion cells used 22% of this capacity to encode visual information. When a decoder received two spike trains of the same response type, the reconstruction improved only marginally over that obtained from a single cell. However, a decoder using an ON and an OFF cell extracted as much information as the sum of that obtained from each cell alone.Thus cells of opposite response type encode different and nonoverlapping features of the stimulus. As more spike trains were provided to the decoder, the total information rate rapidly saturated, with 79% of the maximal value obtained from a local cluster of just four neurons of different functional types. The decoding filter applied to a given neuron's spikes within such a multiunit decoder differed substantially from the filter applied to that same neuron in a single-unit decoder. This shows that the optimal interpretation of a ganglion cell's action potential depends strongly on the simultaneous activity of other nearby cells. The quality of the stimulus reconstruction varied greatly with frequency: flicker components below 1 Hz and above 10 Hz were reconstructed poorly, and the performance was optimal near 2.5 Hz. Further analysis suggests that temporal encoding by ganglion cell spike trains is limited by slow phototransduction in the cone photoreceptors and a corrupting noise source proximal to the cones.

[1]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[2]  W. McCulloch,et al.  The limiting information capacity of a neuronal link , 1952 .

[3]  R. FitzHugh THE STATISTICAL DETECTION OF THRESHOLD SIGNALS IN THE RETINA , 1957, The Journal of general physiology.

[4]  R. FitzHugh A STATISTICAL ANALYZER FOR OPTIC NERVE MESSAGES , 1958, The Journal of general physiology.

[5]  D. Baylor,et al.  Receptive fields of cones in the retina of the turtle , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  P. Marchiafava,et al.  Transfer properties of rod and cone cells in the retina of the tiger salamander , 1976, Vision Research.

[7]  D. Baylor,et al.  Two components of electrical dark noise in toad retinal rod outer segments. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  S. Laughlin A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[9]  Jonathan Stone,et al.  Parallel Processing in the Visual System , 1983, Perspectives in Vision Research.

[10]  Parallel Processing in the Visual System , 1984 .

[11]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial frequency analysis in the visual system. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[13]  J. Dowling The Retina: An Approachable Part of the Brain , 1988 .

[14]  D. Puro The Retina. An Approachable Part of the Brain , 1988 .

[15]  David H. Brainard,et al.  Calibration of a computer controlled color monitor , 1989 .

[16]  F. Werblin,et al.  Amacrine cell interactions underlying the response to change in the tiger salamander retina , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  William Bialek,et al.  Reading a Neural Code , 1991, NIPS.

[18]  H R Matthews,et al.  Light adaptation in cone photoreceptors of the salamander: a role for cytoplasmic calcium. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  A P Georgopoulos Neural coding of the direction of reaching and a comparison with saccadic eye movements. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[20]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[21]  J P Miller,et al.  Representation of sensory information in the cricket cercal sensory system. II. Information theoretic calculation of system accuracy and optimal tuning-curve widths of four primary interneurons. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  William Bialek,et al.  Reliability and information transmission in spiking neurons , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  Fred Rieke,et al.  Coding Efficiency and Information Rates in Sensory Neurons , 1993 .

[24]  William Bialek,et al.  Bits and brains: Information flow in the nervous system , 1993 .

[25]  L F Abbott,et al.  Decoding neuronal firing and modelling neural networks , 1994, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[26]  Markus Meister,et al.  Multi-neuronal signals from the retina: acquisition and analysis , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  D. Baylor,et al.  Concerted Signaling by Retinal Ganglion Cells , 1995, Science.

[28]  W. Bialek,et al.  Naturalistic stimuli increase the rate and efficiency of information transmission by primary auditory afferents , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  J. Roddey,et al.  Information theoretic analysis of dynamical encoding by filiform mechanoreceptors in the cricket cercal system. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[31]  M. Meister Multineuronal codes in retinal signaling. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  S. Laughlin,et al.  The rate of information transfer at graded-potential synapses , 1996, Nature.

[33]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale , 1997, Nature.

[34]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  The structure and precision of retinal spike trains. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.