Consumers’ views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to ‘shared decision‐making’ approaches

Background There is a recognized need to assess the effects of shared decision‐making and other communication interventions. However, the outcomes usually assessed for evidence of ‘effectiveness’ are determined by researchers and have not been based on consumers’ views.

[1]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars , 1999, BMJ.

[2]  Jo-Ellen Asbury,et al.  Overview of Focus Group Research , 1995 .

[3]  A. O'Connor Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  G. Elwyn,et al.  The potential benefits of decision aids in clinical medicine. , 1999, JAMA.

[5]  Jane Frankland,et al.  Some issues arising in the systematic analysis of focus group materials. , 1998 .

[6]  D. Metcalfe A TEXTBOOK OF FAMILY MEDICINE , 1990 .

[7]  W Godolphin,et al.  Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. , 1999, BMJ.

[8]  A Coulter,et al.  Partnerships with Patients: The Pros and Cons of Shared Clinical Decision-Making , 1997, Journal of health services research & policy.

[9]  D. Heaney,et al.  A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations. , 1998, Family practice.

[10]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation. , 1999, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[11]  Susan Michie,et al.  Patient decision making: An evaluation of two different methods of presenting information about a screening test , 1997 .

[12]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  L. Potvin,et al.  Patient perception of quality following a visit to a doctor in a primary care unit. , 2000, Family practice.

[14]  F Sainfort,et al.  Measuring Post-decision Satisfaction , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  G. Elwyn,et al.  How Should Effectiveness of Risk Communication to Aid Patients' Decisions Be Judged? , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[16]  H. Llewellyn-Thomas,et al.  Patients' Health-care Decision Making , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[17]  R. Baker,et al.  Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice. , 1990, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[18]  Deb Feldman-Stewart,et al.  What Questions Do Patients with Curable Prostate Cancer Want Answered? , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[19]  Bernie J. O'Brien,et al.  Income Effects of Reduced Health and Health Effects of Reduced Income: , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[20]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review , 1999, BMJ.

[21]  D. Maynard,et al.  Interaction and Asymmetry in Clinical Discourse , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  M. Holmes-Rovner,et al.  Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Decisions , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[23]  M J Buxton,et al.  Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. , 1998, Health technology assessment.