Bloodstain pattern analysis as optimisation problem.

Bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) is an approach to support forensic investigators in reconstructing the dynamics of bloody crimes. This forensic technique has been successfully applied in solving heinous and complex murder cases around the world and, recently, computer-based BPA approaches have been designed to better support investigators both in terms of speed and quality of analysis. However, despite its widespread use, current automatic techniques for BPA try to define some algorithmic steps to replicate a sequence of subjective investigators' tasks without relying on any mathematical formalism to compute an objective reconstruction of the crime. The lack of an objective mathematical foundation is a critical issue in a scenario where the quality of evidences can strongly affect a court trial and the life of people involved in that trial. This paper introduces the very first formal representation of BPA by means of an optimisation problem, on which to base the next generation of crime reconstruction techniques. As an example of the benefits provided by the proposed formal representation of BPA, a case study based on a genetic algorithm shows how the BPA optimisation problem can support investigators in performing a fast, precise, automatic and objective analysis.

[1]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[2]  Wolfgang Heidrich,et al.  Probabilistic Inverse Dynamics for Blood Pattern Reconstruction , 2011, VMV.

[3]  Paul Suetens,et al.  HemoVision: An automated and virtual approach to bloodstain pattern analysis. , 2015, Forensic science international.

[4]  Stuart H. James,et al.  Principles of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[5]  Giovanni Acampora,et al.  Bloodstain Pattern Analysis - A New Challenge for Computational Intelligence Community , 2014, IJCCI.

[6]  M Illes,et al.  Robust estimation for area of origin in bloodstain pattern analysis via directional analysis. , 2013, Forensic science international.

[7]  Karla G. de Bruin,et al.  Improving the Point of Origin Determination in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  R. Nedunchezhian,et al.  Soft Computing Applications for Database Technologies: Techniques and Issues , 2010 .

[9]  Lars Schmidt,et al.  3D bloodstain pattern analysis: ballistic reconstruction of the trajectories of blood drops and determination of the centres of origin of the bloodstains. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[10]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Naive Set Theory , 1961 .

[11]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Direct Least Square Fitting of Ellipses , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Sanjeev Chandra,et al.  An Evaluation of the Underlying Mechanisms of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Error , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  Benjamin Thomas Cecchetto Nonlinear blood pattern reconstruction , 2010 .

[14]  Stuart H. James,et al.  Directional Analysis of Bloodstain Patterns with a Computer , 2005 .

[15]  B. Widom Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves , 2003 .

[16]  Daniel Attinger,et al.  Fluid dynamics topics in bloodstain pattern analysis: comparative review and research opportunities. , 2013, Forensic science international.

[17]  R. Cerbino Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves , 2006 .

[18]  Pattara Aiyarak,et al.  Impact angle analysis of bloodstains using a simple image processing technique , 2010 .

[19]  Jon J. Nordby Scientific Foundations of Crime Scene Reconstruction: Introducing Method to Mayhem , 2012 .