Robust phase unwrapping based on non-coprime fringe pattern periods for deflectometry measurements

Phase-measuring deflectometry is a technique for non-contact inspection of reflective surfaces. A camera setup captures the reflection of a sine-modulated fringe pattern shifted across a screen; the location-dependent measured phase effectively encodes the screen coordinates. As the used fringe patterns are much narrower than the screen dimension, the resulting phase maps are wrapped. The number-theoretical solution uses the Chinese remainder theorem to calculate an unwrapped phase map from repeated measurements with coprime fringe widths. The technique is highly susceptible to phase noise, i.e. small deviations of the measured phase values generally lead to unwrapped phase values with large errors. We propose a modification and show how non-coprime period widths make phase unwrapping robust against phase noise. Measurements with two non-coprime fringe period widths introduce the opportunity to discriminate between “legal” measured phase value pairs, that potentially originate from noise-free measurements, and “illegal” phase value pairs, that necessarily result from noise-affected measurements. Arranged as a matrix, the legal measurements lie on distinct diagonals. This insight not only allows to determine the legality of a measurement, but also to provide a correction by looking for the closest legal matrix entry. We present an experimental comparison of the resulting phase maps with reference phase maps. The presented results include descriptive statistics on the average rate of illegal phase measurements as well as on the deviation from the reference. The measured mean absolute deviation decreases from 1.99 pixels before correction to 0.21 pixels after correction, with a remaining maximum absolute deviation of 0.91 pixels.

[1]  Markus C. Knauer,et al.  Phase measuring deflectometry: a new approach to measure specular free-form surfaces , 2004, SPIE Photonics Europe.

[2]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Review of phase measuring deflectometry , 2018, Optics and Lasers in Engineering.

[3]  Lei Huang,et al.  Temporal phase unwrapping algorithms for fringe projection profilometry: A comparative review , 2016 .

[4]  Liane Koker,et al.  An Integrated Workflow to Automatically Fabricate Flexible Electronics by Functional Printing and SMT Component Mounting , 2018, 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[5]  Beethoven Bravo-Medina,et al.  One-frame two-dimensional deflectometry for phase retrieval by addition of orthogonal fringe patterns. , 2013, Applied optics.

[6]  Mehdi B. Tahoori,et al.  Printing Technologies for Integration of Electronic Devices and Sensors , 2020 .

[7]  Jürgen Beyerer,et al.  Machine Vision: Automated Visual Inspection: Theory, Practice and Applications , 2015 .

[8]  Petra Kaufmann,et al.  Two Dimensional Phase Unwrapping Theory Algorithms And Software , 2016 .

[9]  Marcus Petz,et al.  Reflection grating method for 3D measurement of reflecting surfaces , 2001, Lasers in Metrology and Art Conservation.

[10]  Heechan Park,et al.  A two dimensional phase-shifting method for deflectometry , 2008, International Symposium on Optomechatronic Technologies.

[11]  Yuankun Liu,et al.  Fast and accurate deflectometry with crossed fringes , 2014, 1404.5727.

[12]  Ramin Takloo-Bighash A Pythagorean Introduction to Number Theory: Right Triangles, Sums of Squares, and Arithmetic , 2018 .