Catch Up at the Micro-Level: Evidence from an Industry Case Study Using Manufacturing Census Data

In this paper we provide a first attempt to analyse catch up at the micro level, not possible in conventional macro-studies. The Indonesian pulp and paper industry has been selected as case-study because it experienced spectacular investment and growth, becoming one of the world’s largest exporters and producers of paper in the world. We apply stochastic frontier analysis to compare technical efficiency of Indonesian paper mills with Finnish plants, which can be considered as the world technological leaders in the industry. The analysis is performed on a pooled dataset based on manufacturing census data for the period 1975-1997. In the paper we address the following questions: What is the distribution of Indonesian plant performance vis-a-vis the technological frontier? What is the role of entry, exit and survival on catch up? And, what are the characteristics of catching-up plants. Although we find that on average the Indonesian paper industry has closed the gap with the technology frontier during the 1990s, catch up has been a highly localised process in which only a few large establishments have achieved near best-practice performance, while most other plants have stayed behind.

[1]  Jonathan R.W. Temple,et al.  The New Growth Evidence , 1999 .

[2]  Hans Gersbach,et al.  Efficiency in Manufacturing and the Need for Global Competition , 1995 .

[3]  E. Wolff,et al.  Competitiveness, convergence, and international specialization , 1994 .

[4]  D. Pilat,et al.  Comparisons of Purchasing Power, Real Output and Labour Productivity in Manufacturing in Japan, South Korea and the U.S.A., 1975-85 , 1990 .

[5]  E. Wolff,et al.  Growth in a Dual Economy , 1993 .

[6]  Enso Oyj,et al.  Economics of the pulp and paper industry , 1998 .

[7]  A. Müller.  The Indonesian Economy Since 1966 , 1998 .

[8]  E. F. Denison,et al.  Why Growth Rates Differ. , 1969 .

[9]  Saul Lach,et al.  Is "Learning-by-Exporting" Important? Micro-dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco , 1996 .

[10]  Colin Thirtle,et al.  TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY AND THE EFFECTS OF R&D IN AFRICAN AGRICULTURE , 1997 .

[11]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[13]  Martin Neil Baily,et al.  International Productivity Comparisons Built from the Firm Level , 2001 .

[14]  M. Timmer.  The dynamics of Asian manufacturing : a comparative perspective in the late twentieth century , 2000 .

[15]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Uneven growth between interdependent economies : an evolutionary view on technology gaps, trade and growth , 1994 .

[16]  J. Haltiwanger,et al.  Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence , 1998 .

[17]  P. Howitt,et al.  Endogenous Growth Theory , 1999 .

[18]  M. Van.  Industry evolution in developing countries : the Indonesian pulp and paper industry , 2003 .

[19]  Howard Pack.  Productivity, Technology, and Industrial Development: A Case Study in Textiles , 1987 .

[20]  R. Ramanathan,et al.  Introductory Econometrics With Applications , 1989 .

[21]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency , 1997 .

[22]  F. Sjöholm.  Productivity Growth in Indonesia: The Role of Regional Characteristics and Direct Foreign Investment , 1999, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[23]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  M. V. Dijk.  South African manufacturing performance in international perspective, 1970-1999 , 2005 .

[25]  M. Fafchamps.  Industrial Structure and Microenterprises in Africa , 1994 .

[26]  A. Maddison,et al.  The World economy :a millennial perspective , 2001 .

[27]  Patrick Clawson,et al.  The East Asian miracle: Economic growth and public policy: By the World Bank. (New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank, 1993. 389 pp. $19.95, paper.) , 1995 .

[28]  A. Drejer.  Innovation and learning , 2003 .

[29]  R. Salomon,et al.  Learning by Exporting , 2014 .

[30]  Jess Benhabib,et al.  The role of human capital in economic development Evidence from aggregate cross-country data , 1994 .

[31]  Hal Hill.  The Indonesian Economy , 2000 .

[32]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[33]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates , 1994 .

[34]  M. Audibert.  Technical inefficiency effects among paddy farmers at the 'Office du Niger', Mali, West Africa , 1996 .

[35]  H. Katayama,et al.  Why Plant-Level Productivity Studies are Often Misleading, and an Alternative Approach to Interference , 2003 .

[36]  George E. Battese,et al.  Firm size, age and efficiency: Evidence from Kenyan manufacturing firms , 2000 .

[37]  Dwight H. Perkins,et al.  Social Capability and Long-Term Economic Growth , 1995 .

[38]  M. Abramovitz.  Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind , 1986, The Journal of Economic History.

[39]  R. Kneller,et al.  Absorptive Capacity and Frontier Technology: Evidence from OECD Manufacturing Industries , 2002 .

[40]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation and Catching-Up , 2006 .

[41]  Howard Pack,et al.  Inflows of Foreign Technology and Indigenous Technological Development , 1997 .

[42]  Martin Neil Baily,et al.  Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants , 1992 .

[43]  Micheline Goedhuys,et al.  Growth of firms in developing countries, evidence from Cote d'Ivoire , 2002 .

[44]  Adam Szirmai,et al.  Technical efficiency and embodied technical change in the Indonesian pulp and paper industry , 2006 .

[45]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence , 2002 .

[46]  Saul Lach,et al.  Is "Learning-by-Exporting" Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco , 1996 .

[47]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  North-South R & D Spillovers , 1997 .

[48]  M. Timmer.  The Dynamics of Asian Manufacturing , 2000 .

[49]  Karin Wagner,et al.  Productivity, Product Quality and Workforce Skills: Food Processing in Four European Countries , 1994, National Institute Economic Review.

[50]  J. Haltiwanger,et al.  Aggregate Productivity Growth , 2001 .

[51]  Eric J. Bartelsman,et al.  Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata , 2000 .

[52]  B. Ark.  Issues in Measurement and International Comparison of Productivity - An Overview , 1996 .

[53]  M. Baily.  Productivity Growth and Materials Use in U. S. Manufacturing , 1986 .

[54]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion and transformation:an evolutionary interpretation , 2002 .

[55]  M. Cimoli,et al.  Structural reforms, technological gaps and economic development: a Latin American perspective , 2003 .

[56]  J. Tybout,et al.  Manufacturing Firms in Developing Countries: How Well Do They Do, and Why? , 1998 .

[57]  M. Audibert.  Technical Inefficiency Effects Among Paddy Farmers in the Villages of the ‘Office du Niger’, Mali, West Africa , 1997 .

[58]  A. Gerschenkron,et al.  Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective , 1963 .

[59]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Productivity, Output, and Failure: A Comparison of Taiwanese and Korean Manufacturers , 2002 .

[60]  Kaisa Ojainmaa.  International Competitive Advantage of the Finnish Chemical Forest Industry , 1994 .

[61]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A Guide to Frontier version 4. 1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Fu , 1996 .

[62]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Industrial evolution in developing countries : micro patterns of turnover, productivity, and market structure , 1996 .

[63]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Industrial Efficiency in Six Nations , 1992 .