The Impact of Geographic Proximity on What to Buy, How to Buy, and Where to Buy: Evidence from High-Tech Durable Goods Market

Social contagion effects due to geographical proximity refer to the social effects wherein the behavior of an individual varies with the behavior of other individuals who are geographically close. Although the influence of such effects on consumer choices has been established in several contexts, much of the extant studies have focused on its effect on consumers’ decision of whether to buy a new product or adopt a new innovation. There has been no systematic examination of the influence of geographic proximity on other aspects of consumers’ product buying process such as what to buy (i.e., brand choice), how to buy (i.e., the channel), and where to buy (i.e., retailers). Such effects can matter significantly in high-technology and durable goods markets and therefore, it is critical to understand the scope of these on consumers’ choice of retailers and channel as well. Drawing on literatures from word of mouth effects, ecommerce, and consumers’ perception of risk in their purchase process, we develop a set of hypotheses on the effect of geographic proximity on consumers’ choices of what to buy, how to buy, and where to buy. Leveraging a microlevel dataset of purchases of personal computers, we develop brand-, retailer-, and channel-related measures of proximity effects at the individual consumer level and estimate a joint disaggregate model of the three choices that make up a product purchase process to test these hypotheses. Our results indicate a significant contagion effect on each of the three choices. Furthermore, we find evidence of a greater effect of geographic proximity on inexperienced consumers—those who are new to the product category. Our results thus help develop a holistic understanding of the influence of social contagion effects on consumers’ decision making.

[1]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[2]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  Influences on consumer use of word-of-mouth recommendation sources , 1997 .

[3]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[4]  Austan Goolsbee Competition in the Computer Industry: Online versus Retail , 2001 .

[5]  Leon G. Schiffman,et al.  Risk- and Personality-Related Dimensions of Store Choice , 1976 .

[6]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis , 1980 .

[7]  Mohammad S. Rahman,et al.  Battle of the Retail Channels: How Product Selection and Geography Drive Cross-Channel Competition , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[8]  G. Urban,et al.  You have printed the following article : Modeling Multiattribute Utility , Risk , and Belief Dynamics for New Consumer Durable Brand Choice , 2007 .

[9]  K. A. Coney,et al.  Dogmatism and Innovation: A Replication , 1972 .

[10]  Daniel A. Ackerberg Empirically Distinguishing Informative and Prestige Effects of Advertising , 2001 .

[11]  Jerome B. Kernan,et al.  Perceived Risk in Store Selection , 1972 .

[12]  Timothy G. Conley,et al.  Learning About a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana , 2010 .

[13]  Alan T. Sorensen,et al.  Social learning and health plan choice. , 2006, The Rand journal of economics.

[14]  J. F. Engel,et al.  Perceived Risk in Mail-Order and Retail Store Buying , 1970 .

[15]  Ying Xie,et al.  The Role of Targeted Communication and Contagion in Product Adoption , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[16]  D. Horsky,et al.  Advertising and the Diffusion of New Products , 1983 .

[17]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Stefan Stremersch,et al.  Social Contagion and Income Heterogeneity in New Product Diffusion: A Meta-Analytic Test , 2004 .

[19]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Competition between Local and Electronic Markets: How the Benefit of Buying Online Depends on Where You Live , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[20]  P. Herr,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective , 1991 .

[21]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  Evidence on Learning and Network Externalities in the Diffusion of Home Computers* , 2002, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[22]  D. Strang,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Nazrul I. Shaikh,et al.  The Role of Spatial Proximity in the Adoption of a Digital Product , 2008 .

[24]  Donald F. Cox,et al.  Perceived Risk and Consumer Decision-Making—The Case of Telephone Shopping , 1964 .

[25]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[26]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  Consumption Externalities and Diffusion in Pharmaceutical Markets: Antiulcer Drugs , 2003 .

[27]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Leon G. Schiffman,et al.  Risk- and Personality-Related Dimensions of Store Choice , 1976 .

[29]  R. Pindyck,et al.  Consumption Externalities and Diffusion in Pharmaceutical Markets: Antiulcer Drugs , 2000 .

[30]  V. K. Prasad Socioeconomic Product Risk and Patronage Preferences of Retail Shoppers , 1975 .

[31]  S. M. Cunningham,et al.  Personality Variables and the Consumer Decision Process , 1968 .