Modeling the cost-effectiveness of stormwater best management practices in an urban watershed in Las Vegas Valley

Abstract The Las Vegas Valley is one of the fastest growing urban areas in the United States. Any future urbanization and climate change, especially if the climate becomes wetter and there are more intense and frequent storm events, will undoubtedly cause excessive urban stormwater runoff and exacerbate flooding in the Valley. Stormwater management is therefore one of the key challenges to the local government. The main goal of this study was to ascertain the utility of Best management Practices (BMPs) in mitigating stormwater runoff in the Duck Creek watershed in the Las Vegas Valley. The cost-effectiveness of different BMPs were also compared so as to determine the best BMP arrangement under the current and future climate and land use change conditions. By applying SUSTAIN (System for Urban Stormwater Treatment and Analysis INtegration) as a comprehensive GIS-based modeling and decision support system in the BMP analyses, modeling results show that although the installation of the existing three detention basins in the watershed can provide a 9% flow reduction, these three detention basins alone will not be adequate in the future with the impending changes in climate and land use. To alleviate the potential problems of water resources, SUSTAIN was further used to determine the number of additional BMPs required, the optimal types of BMPs (such as, detention and infiltration BMPs), and their locations in reducing storm runoff in the watershed under the future land-use and climate regimes. By comparing the performances of five potential BMP implementation scenarios, it was found that a mixed implementation of one additional detention BMP and one infiltration BMP to the existing detention BMPs in the downstream area of the watershed would be the most cost-effective stormwater runoff control solution in face of future urbanization and climate change. Depending on the locations of the new detention and infiltration BMPs, surface flow, even without BMP retrofit options, could be reduced by 27–31%. The cost for such installations would range from $1,141,000 to $1,319,000. This information may be useful to local planners and water resource managers in their efforts to develop alternative stormwater management plans in the arid Southwest.

[1]  Jehn-Yih Juang,et al.  On the spectrum of soil moisture from hourly to interannual scales , 2007 .

[2]  J. Niu,et al.  A multilevel analysis of effects of land use policy on land-cover change and local land use decisions , 2014 .

[3]  Martin Volk,et al.  The impact of Best Management Practices on simulated streamflow and sediment load in a Central Brazilian catchment. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  David J. Sample,et al.  Costs of Best Management Practices and Associated Land for Urban Stormwater Control , 2003 .

[5]  K. Acharya,et al.  Best Management Practices for Stormwater Management in the Desert Southwest , 2010 .

[6]  Y. Jeffrey Yang,et al.  Predicting plausible impacts of sets of climate and land use change scenarios on water resources , 2012 .

[7]  Fu-hsiung Lai,et al.  Sustain - an Epa Bmp Process and Placement Tool for Urban Watersheds , 2007 .

[8]  Pablo E. Villagra,et al.  Land use and disturbance effects on the dynamics of natural ecosystems of the Monte Desert: implications for their management. , 2009 .

[9]  Susanna T. Y. Tong,et al.  Exploring the effects of population growth on future land use change in the Las Vegas Wash watershed: an integrated approach of geospatial modeling and analytics , 2013, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[10]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[11]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  Modeling effectiveness of agricultural BMPs to reduce sediment load and organophosphate pesticides in surface runoff. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Eric D. Stein,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices Using Dynamic Modeling , 2008 .

[13]  K. Stave.  A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  John Riverson,et al.  A watershed-scale design optimization model for stormwater best management practices , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  W. J. Gburek,et al.  Use of the SWAT Model to Quantify Water Quality Effects of Agricultural BMPs at the Farm-Scale Level , 2008 .

[16]  R. L. Morris,et al.  Urbanization and Water Conservation in Las Vegas Valley, Nevada , 1997 .

[17]  G. Yohe,et al.  Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment , 2014 .

[18]  J. L. Kittle,et al.  Hydrological simulation program: Fortran. User's manual for release 10 , 1993 .

[19]  John Doherty,et al.  Comparison of hydrologic calibration of HSPF using automatic and manual methods , 2007 .

[20]  Susanna T. Y. Tong,et al.  A total water management analysis of the Las Vegas Wash watershed, Nevada , 2014 .

[21]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[22]  T. Piechota,et al.  NUTRIENT CONTRIBUTION OF NONPOINT SOURCE RUNOFF IN THE LAS VEGAS VALLEY 1 , 2004 .

[23]  George Xian,et al.  An analysis of urban development and its environmental impact on the Tampa Bay watershed. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Emanuele Lugato,et al.  An integrated non-point source model-GIS system for selecting criteria of best management practices in the Po Valley, North Italy , 2004 .

[25]  Sajjad Ahmad,et al.  Evaluating the impact of water conservation on fate of outdoor water use: a study in an arid region. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.