Upstream fishway performance by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) spawners at complex hydropower dams — is prior experience a success criterion?

Passage of hydropower plants by upstream-migrating salmonid spawners is associated with reduced migration success, and the need for knowledge of fish behavior downstream of dams is widely recognized. In this study, we examined fishway passage of landlocked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in River Klarälven, Sweden, and brown trout (Salmo trutta) in River Gudbrandslågen, Norway, and the influence of prior experience on passage success in 2012 and 2013. Fishway trap efficiency varied from 18% to 88% and was influenced by river discharge. Most salmon (81%) entered the fishway trap on days without spill, and salmon moved from the turbine area to the spill zone when there was spill, with small individuals showing a stronger reaction than large fish. Analysis of fish with and without prior trap experience showed that a higher percentage of the “naïve” fish (70% of salmon and 43% of the trout) entered the fishway traps than the “experienced” ones (25% of the salmon and 15% of the trout). Delays for fish that entered the trap ranged from 3 to 70 days for salmon and 2 to 47 days for trout.

[1]  P. Nilsson,et al.  Upstream and downstream passage of migrating adult Atlantic salmon : Remedial measures improve passage performance at a hydropower dam , 2017 .

[2]  S. Gustafsson,et al.  Ice cover alters the behavior and stress level of brown trout Salmo trutta , 2015 .

[3]  L. Greenberg,et al.  Conservation of endemic landlocked salmonids in regulated rivers: a case‐study from Lake Vänern, Sweden , 2012 .

[4]  J. Zydlewski,et al.  The Effects of Smolt Stocking Strategies on Migratory Path Selection of Adult Atlantic Salmon in the Penobscot River, Maine , 2009 .

[5]  C. Revenga,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems , 2005, Science.

[6]  J. Krause,et al.  Learning in fishes: From three-second memory to culture , 2003 .

[7]  Kevin N. Laland,et al.  Social learning in fishes : a review , 2003 .

[8]  Eva B. Thorstad,et al.  Upstream migration of Atlantic salmon at a power station on the River Nidelva, Southern Norway , 2003 .

[9]  T. Quinn,et al.  MIGRATORY COSTS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EGG SIZE AND NUMBER IN INTRODUCED AND INDIGENOUS SALMON POPULATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  P. Rivinoja,et al.  Hindrances to upstream migration of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in a Northern Swedish river caused by a hydroelectric power-station , 2001 .

[11]  Imants G. Priede,et al.  Movements of adult Atlantic salmon in relation to a hydroelectric dam and fish ladder , 1999 .

[12]  Charles H. Clay,et al.  Design of Fishways and Other Fish Facilities , 1995 .

[13]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Relationship between Bioenergetics and Behavior in Anadromous Fish Migrations , 1987 .

[14]  E. Black,et al.  The effect of intermittent exercise on carbohydrate metabolism in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) , 1966 .

[15]  B. Jonsson,et al.  Habitats as Template for Life Histories , 2011 .

[16]  G Marmulla,et al.  Dams, fish and fisheries: Opportunities, challenges and conflict resolution , 2001 .

[17]  Cunada.  Effects of Swim Speed and Activity Pattern on Success of Adult , Sockeye Salmon Migration through an Area of Difficult Passage , 2000 .

[18]  J. Sumpter,et al.  Effects of stress on reproduction and growth of fish. , 1997 .

[19]  Jo Vegar Arnekleiv,et al.  Migratory behaviour of adult fast-growing brown trout (Salmo trutta, L.) In relation to water flow in a regulated Norwegian river , 1996 .

[20]  H. Dingle.  Migration: The Biology of Life on the Move , 1996 .