Non-RF to RF Test Correlation Using Learning Machines: A Case Study

The authors present a case study that employs production test data from an RF device to assess the effectiveness of four different methods in predicting the pass/fail labels of fabricated devices based on a subset of performances and, thereby, in decreasing test cost. The device employed is a zero-IF down-converter for cell-phone applications and the four methods range from a sample maximum-cover algorithm to an advanced ontogenic neural network. The results indicate that a subset of non-RF performances suffice to predict correctly the pass/fail label for the vast majority of the devices and that the addition of a few select RF performances holds great potential for reducing misprediction to industrially acceptable levels. Based on these results, the authors then discuss enhancements and experiments that will further corroborate the utility of these methods within the cost realities of analog/RF production testing.

[1]  S. Muthukrishnan,et al.  Subspace Sampling and Relative-Error Matrix Approximation: Column-Row-Based Methods , 2006, ESA.

[2]  G. N. Stenbakken,et al.  Developing linear error models for analog devices , 1993 .

[3]  Jack Sklansky,et al.  A note on genetic algorithms for large-scale feature selection , 1989, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[4]  Michael W. Berry,et al.  Algorithm 844: Computing sparse reduced-rank approximations to sparse matrices , 2005, TOMS.

[5]  S. Muthukrishnan,et al.  Subspace Sampling and Relative-Error Matrix Approximation: Column-Based Methods , 2006, APPROX-RANDOM.

[6]  Gerard N. Stenbakken,et al.  A comprehensive approach for modeling and testing analog and mixed-signal devices , 1990, Proceedings. International Test Conference 1990.

[7]  Gerard N. Stenbakken,et al.  Test-point selection and testability measures via QR factorization of linear models , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  Yiorgos Makris,et al.  Independent test sequence compaction through integer programming , 2003, Proceedings 21st International Conference on Computer Design.

[9]  Jay B. Brockman,et al.  Predictive subset testing: optimizing IC parametric performance testing for quality, cost, and yield , 1989 .

[10]  Yiorgos Makris,et al.  Constructive derivation of analog specification test criteria , 2005, 23rd IEEE VLSI Test Symposium (VTS'05).

[11]  Yiorgos Makris,et al.  Bridging the accuracy of functional and machine-learning-based mixed-signal testing , 2006, 24th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium.

[12]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[13]  Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli,et al.  Minimizing production test time to detect faults in analog circuits , 1994, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[14]  Tom A. M. Kevenaar,et al.  Iterative test-point selection for analog circuits , 1996, Proceedings of 14th VLSI Test Symposium.

[15]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[16]  Michael Peter Kennedy,et al.  A rigorous exposition of the LEMMA method for analog and mixed-signal testing , 1999, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[17]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[18]  Prashant Goteti,et al.  Test set selection for structural faults in analog IC's , 1999, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..