How Selfish Are Self-Expression Values? A Civicness Test

Various analyses of World Values Survey data find a syndrome of emancipative orientations, mostly known as “self-expression values,” on the rise throughout all countries with longitudinal evidence. But, as much as scholarship agrees on the rise of self-expression values, there is disagreement on whether these values are civic or uncivic in character. Some declare self-expression values uncivic because they see them as indicative of egoism and weak social capital. Others consider self-expression values as civic for the opposite reasons. They interpret them as a sign of altruism and strong social capital. Cross-cultural evidence from the World Values Surveys supports the civic view on both accounts. First, in a Schwartz value space, self-expression values are associated with altruism, especially at high levels of self-expression values. Second, in a social capital space, self-expression values go together with trust in people and peaceful collective action. The findings qualify self-expression values as a civic form of modern individualism.

[1]  E. Uslaner The Moral Foundations of Trust , 2002 .

[2]  Welzel Christian,et al.  Modernization, cultural change, and democracy , 2005 .

[3]  S. Schwartz Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[4]  S. Shalom Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world , 2004, Comparing Cultures.

[5]  J. Gill Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[6]  J. Storey,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: into the 1990s , 1993 .

[7]  Scott C. Flanagan,et al.  The New Politics, Culture Wars, and The Authoritarian-Libertarian Value Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies , 2003 .

[8]  C. Welzel,et al.  Social capital, voluntary associations and collective action: Which aspects of social capital have the greatest ‘civic’ payoff? , 2005 .

[9]  I. Ferić Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Croatian Evidence , 2007 .

[10]  S. Schwartz A Theory Of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication And Applications , 2006 .

[11]  D. Spini,et al.  Measurement Equivalence Of 10 Value Types From The Schwartz Value Survey Across 21 Countries , 2003 .

[12]  Cigdem Kagitcibasi,et al.  Autonomy and Relatedness in Cultural Context , 2005 .

[13]  Amitai Etzioni The Spirit Of Community , 1994 .

[14]  H. Triandis Individualism And Collectivism , 1995 .

[15]  David Richards,et al.  Respect for Human Rights after the End of the Cold War , 1999 .

[16]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Structural Equivalence of the Values Domain Across Cultures , 2008 .

[17]  R. Fischer,et al.  Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias , 2004 .

[18]  S. Schwartz Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. , 2007 .

[19]  R. Inglehart,et al.  Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[20]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis , 2004 .

[21]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[22]  David F. Midgley,et al.  Formative versus reflective measurement models: two applications of formative measurement | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2008 .

[23]  R. Hardin Trust and Trustworthiness , 2002 .

[24]  Ronald Inglehart,et al.  The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis , 2003 .

[25]  K. Newton,et al.  How General Is Trust in “Most People”? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem , 2011 .