Prediction of motor imagery based brain computer interface performance using a reaction time test

Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) enable human brains to interact directly with machines. Motor imagery based BCI (MI-BCI) encodes the motor intentions of human agents and provides feedback accordingly. However, 15-30% of people are not able to perform vivid motor imagery. To save time and monetary resources, a number of predictors have been proposed to screen for users with low BCI aptitude. While the proposed predictors provide some level of correlation with MI-BCI performance, simple, objective and accurate predictors are currently not available. Thus, in this study we have examined the utility of a simple reaction time (SRT) test for predicting MI-BCI performance. We enrolled 10 subjects and measured their motor imagery performance with either visual or proprioceptive feedback. Their reaction time was also measured using a SRT test. The results show a significant negative correlation (r ≈ -0.67) between SRT and MI-BCI performance. Therefore SRT may be used as a simple and reliable predictor of MI-BCI performance.

[1]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Does feedback modality affect performance of brain computer interfaces? , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[2]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  The predictive role of pre-cue EEG rhythms on MI-based BCI classification performance , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Modern mental chronometry , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[4]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  R. Magill.  Motor learning and control : concepts and applications , 2004 .

[6]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Enhancement of left-right sensorimotor EEG differences during feedback-regulated motor imagery. , 1999, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[7]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based discrimination between imagination of right and left hand movement. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Sung Chan Jun,et al.  High Theta and Low Alpha Powers May Be Indicative of BCI-Illiteracy in Motor Imagery , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  K. Müller,et al.  Psychological predictors of SMR-BCI performance , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[10]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Causal influence of gamma oscillations on the sensorimotor rhythm , 2011, NeuroImage.

[11]  Alireza Gharabaghi,et al.  Oscillatory entrainment of the motor cortical network during motor imagery is modulated by the feedback modality , 2015, NeuroImage.

[12]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  J. Peters,et al.  Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[14]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  Using NIRS as a predictor for EEG-based BCI performance , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Aleksandra Vuckovic,et al.  Using a motor imagery questionnaire to estimate the performance of a Brain–Computer Interface based on object oriented motor imagery , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  B. Varkuti,et al.  Prediction of brain-computer interface aptitude from individual brain structure , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..