Quadratic dose-response relationship between caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) and EEG correlation dimension

Abstract Many studies have failed to determine a systematic dose-response relationship across different cognitive tasks between caffeine and EEG power spectra. However, a nonlinear approach to EEG analysis, which reconstructs a multi-dimensional state space from each electrode recording, can be used to compute the number of active degrees of freedom in the signal (the correlation dimension, D2), and can be interpreted as a measure of signal complexity. This study attempted to determine a consistent dose-response relationship between caffeine and EEG D2, across six oral caffeine doses (100–600 mg), with each subject acting as their own control, to create a probabilistic bias against finding any consistent linear or nonlinear dose-response relationship across different cognitive tasks. The experiment (n = 10) was conducted with three within-subjects explanatory variables, 2 (experimental, placebo) × 8 (caffeine level) × 4 (type of cognitive task performed), with EEG D2 as the response variable, measured from Fz, F3, F4 and Cz. A significant three-way interaction was found [F(21,245.3) = 3.65, P = 0.001]. Regression analyses revealed a linear trend for the response variable across trials for the placebo condition (average R2 = 0.54), whereas linear+quadratic trends explained an average 30% of the variance for the experimental condition, compared to 0.01% for the linear fit, indicating a robust quadratic dose-response relationship between caffeine and EEG D2. Three conditions had positive quadratic co-efficients, and one condition had a negative quadratic co-efficient. These results are discussed in terms of the implications for brain dynamics, and with respect to recent criticisms of the computation of D2 from EEG.

[1]  M. Möller,et al.  Errors from digitizing and noise in estimating attractor dimensions , 1989 .

[2]  A W Peck,et al.  Effects of caffeine and cyclizine alone and in combination on human performance, subjective effects and EEG activity. , 1979, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[3]  Astrid Nehlig,et al.  Caffeine and the central nervous system: mechanisms of action, biochemical, metabolic and psychostimulant effects , 1992, Brain Research Reviews.

[4]  James J. Wright,et al.  Dynamics of the brain at global and microscopic scales: Neural networks and the EEG , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  J. Röschke,et al.  A nonlinear approach to brain function: deterministic chaos and sleep EEG. , 1992, Sleep.

[6]  M. Lader,et al.  The psychopharmacological and electrophysiological effects of single doses of caffeine in healthy human subjects. , 1986, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[7]  P E Roland,et al.  Localization of cortical areas activated by thinking. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[9]  James Theiler,et al.  Statistical error in a chord estimator of correlation dimension: The rule of five'' , 1993 .

[10]  Robert A. M. Gregson,et al.  Cognitive load as a determinant of the dimensionality of the electroencephalogram: A replication study , 1993, Biological Psychology.

[11]  W R Millington,et al.  Blood-brain barrier transport of caffeine: dose-related restriction of adenine transport. , 1982, Life sciences.

[12]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[13]  J. Leon Kenemans,et al.  Caffeine and selective visual processing , 1995, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[14]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[15]  Paul A. Watters,et al.  Caffeine and Cognitive Performance: The Nonlinear Yerkes–Dodson Law , 1997 .

[16]  James Theiler,et al.  On the evidence for how-dimensional chaos in an epileptic electroencephalogram , 1995 .

[17]  S H Snyder,et al.  Adenosine receptors in the central nervous system: relationship to the central actions of methylxanthines. , 1981, Life sciences.

[18]  W. H. Loke Effects of repeated caffeine administration on cognition and mood , 1990 .

[19]  M. Rosenstein,et al.  Reconstruction expansion as a geometry-based framework for choosing proper delay times , 1994 .

[20]  J. C. Woestenburg,et al.  The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain , 1983, Biological Psychology.

[21]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Geometry from a Time Series , 1980 .

[22]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .

[23]  Martin Casdagli,et al.  An analytic approach to practical state space reconstruction , 1992 .