Egocentric and geocentric navigation during extremely long foraging paths of desert ants

Desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, navigate individually in the salt pans of Tunisia by means of path integration. However, as path integration is error-prone, the ants in addition use visual and olfactory cues to pinpoint their nest entrance. It has been shown that the accuracy of the path integrator as well as the ants’ confidence in that egocentric navigational tool decreases with increasing foraging distance. Here, we show that despite the accumulating errors, even after far-reaching foraging runs path integration provides the ants with surprisingly accurate information regarding the nest position. However, in addition, the ants take into account distant visual cues that are most probably provided by the patterns along the horizon line behind the nest entrance.

[1]  R. Wehner,et al.  The Ant Odometer: Stepping on Stilts and Stumps , 2006, Science.

[2]  Allen Cheung,et al.  Ant Navigation: Fractional Use of the Home Vector , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  R Wehner,et al.  Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  R. Wehner,et al.  The desert ant odometer: a stride integrator that accounts for stride length and walking speed , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[5]  Antoine Wystrach,et al.  Landmarks or panoramas: what do navigating ants attend to for guidance? , 2011, Frontiers in Zoology.

[6]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  The significance of direct sunlight and polarized skylight in the ant’s celestial system of navigation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Guy Beugnon,et al.  Use of Long-Term Stored Vector Information in the Neotropical Ant Gigantiops destructor , 2005, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[8]  A. Cheung,et al.  Which coordinate system for modelling path integration? , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning in bees , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[10]  R. Wehner,et al.  Vector-based and landmark-guided navigation in desert ants of the same species inhabiting landmark-free and landmark-rich environments , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  Andrew Philippides,et al.  Snapshots in ants? New interpretations of paradigmatic experiments , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  Ajay Narendra,et al.  Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti I. Proportional path-integration takes the ant half-way home , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  R. Wehner,et al.  The ant’s estimation of distance travelled: experiments with desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Searching behaviour of desert ants, genusCataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[15]  R. Wehner,et al.  The hidden spiral: systematic search and path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[16]  Markus Knaden,et al.  Smells like home: Desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, use olfactory landmarks to pinpoint the nest , 2009, Frontiers in Zoology.

[17]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  Nest-mark orientation versus vector navigation in desert ants , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  Nest mark orientation in desert ants Cataglyphis: what does it do to the path integrator? , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Paul Graham,et al.  Desert Ants Locate Food by Combining High Sensitivity to Food Odors with Extensive Crosswind Runs , 2014, Current Biology.

[20]  Allen Cheung,et al.  Finding the Way with a Noisy Brain , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  R. Wehner,et al.  Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  R. Wehner.  The architecture of the desert ant's navigational toolkit (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2009 .

[23]  M. Collett.  How Navigational Guidance Systems Are Combined in a Desert Ant , 2012, Current Biology.

[24]  T. Fukushi,et al.  Homing in wood ants, Formica japonica: use of the skyline panorama. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  Ajay Narendra,et al.  Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti II. Interaction of the path integrator with visual cue information , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  R. Wehner.  Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[27]  Markus Knaden,et al.  Path Integration Controls Nest-Plume Following in Desert Ants , 2012, Current Biology.

[28]  R. Wehner,et al.  Uncertainty about nest position influences systematic search strategies in desert ants , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  Repeated training does not improve the path integrator in desert ants , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Vector-based and landmark-guided navigation in desert ants inhabiting landmark-free and landmark-rich environments , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  R. Wehner,et al.  Desert ants use foraging distance to adapt the nest search to the uncertainty of the path integrator , 2010 .

[32]  J. Zeil,et al.  Mapping the navigational knowledge of individually foraging ants, Myrmecia croslandi , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  R. Wehner.  Spatial organization of foraging behavior in individually searching desert ants, Cataglyphis (Sahara Desert) and Ocymyrmex (Namib Desert) , 1987 .

[34]  Matthew Collett,et al.  How desert ants use a visual landmark for guidance along a habitual route , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  R. Wehner,et al.  Wind and sky as compass cues in desert ant navigation , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.