Abstracts of the British Society of Audiology Short Papers Meeting on Experimental Studies of Hearing and Deafness

International Journal of Audiology 2010; 49: 141–183 Abstracts of the British Society of Audiology Short Papers Meeting on Experimental Studies of Hearing and Deafnesss of the British Society of Audiology Short Papers Meeting on Experimental Studies of Hearing and Deafness September 18–19, 2008, Department of Psychology, University of York, UK Poster communications Characterization of fi brocyte cultures from rat and mouse spiral ligament S. Mahendrasingam, P. Robinson and D.N. Furness. Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK Five main types of fi brocyte are distinguishable in the spiral ligament by their morphology, location, and relative expression of specifi c proteins: types III and IV fi brocyte express caldesmon, type I expresses also S-100, whilst types II and V express both plus Na+/K+ATPase and the glutamate transporter GLAST. Fibrocyte cultures may be useful in the development of cellular transplantation therapy to ameliorate strial presbyacusis, and have previously been grown from gerbils and mice. The aim of this study was to characterize fi brocyte cultures grown from adult Sprague-Dawley rats, CD-1 and CBA/CaJ mice. Methods were based on those of Suko et al (2000). Cochleae were excised and opened in culture medium (Invitrogen, MEM-α). Lateral wall segments were placed strial side down in collagen I coated 30 mm wells, cover-slipped and left overnight, after which the coverslip was removed. Adherent segments were incubated for 2–3 weeks, forming primary cultures, trypsinized and reseeded for secondary culturing. For immunostaining, secondary cultures grown for 2–3 weeks on coverslips were fi xed in paraformaldehyde and labelled for caldesmon, S-100, Na+/K+ATPase, or GLAST. For scanning electron microscopy coverslips were fi xed in glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide, dried and coated with gold. For transmission electron microscopy cells were grown on plastic sheets, fi xed in glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide and embedded in Spurr resin. Sprague-Dawley rat and CD-1 mice cultures grew well and were sub-cultured easily. Cultured cells varied in morphology, either long and/or broad with thin processes, spindle-like or small stellatelike shapes. CBA/CaJ cultures developed poorly, giving rise to squamous and spindle-like cells, and were not characterized further. Rat and CD-1 cultured cells showed positive caldesmon labelling resembling stress fi bre patterns of fi broblasts. Broader cells were weakly positive for Na+/K+ATPase around the nucleus, and S-100 and GLAST, spread throughout the cells. The spindle and stellate cells were strongly positive for all three. Preliminary analysis of CD-1 cultures using transmission electron microscopy showed the highly fl attened broad cells to contain normal mitochondria and actin stress fi bres. These results show that cells that express proteins characteristic of all the fi brocytes can be grown from the lateral wall of both rats ISSN 1499-2027 print/ISSN 1708-8186 online DOI: 10.3109/14992020903426264 „ 2010 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society Received: October 16 2009 Accepted: October 16 2009 and mice. However, some mouse strains may be more suitable than others. Culture cells from CD-1 adults may be in better condition metabolically than their precursors as they have normal mitochondria unlike those found in situ in three to fi ve-week old mice.

[1]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Development of a fast method for determining sensitivity to temporal fine structure , 2009, International journal of audiology.

[3]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Spectro-Temporal Characteristics of Speech at High Frequencies, and the Potential for Restoration of Audibility to People with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Ray Meddis,et al.  A cascade autocorrelation model of pitch perception. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D. Pressnitzer,et al.  Perceptual Organization of Sound Begins in the Auditory Periphery , 2008, Current Biology.

[6]  I. Winter,et al.  Reverberation Challenges the Temporal Representation of the Pitch of Complex Sounds , 2008, Neuron.

[7]  Dan Gnansia,et al.  Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release , 2008, Hearing Research.

[8]  Mathieu Lavandier,et al.  Speech segregation in rooms: monaural, binaural, and interacting effects of reverberation on target and interferer. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Elizabeth A. Strickland,et al.  The relationship between precursor level and the temporal effect. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Cochlear Implant Speech Processor Frequency Allocations May Influence Pitch Perception , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity Finds the Start of Repeating Patterns in Continuous Spike Trains , 2008, PloS one.

[13]  Ray Meddis,et al.  A computer model of medial efferent suppression in the mammalian auditory system. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J. Culling,et al.  Speech segregation in rooms: effects of reverberation on both target and interferer. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Nicolas Grimault,et al.  Effect of spectral smearing on the perceptual segregation of vowel sequences , 2007, Hearing Research.

[16]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Paula C. Stacey,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training in improving the perception of noise-vocoded speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Louise Loiselle,et al.  An Electric Frequency-to-place Map for a Cochlear Implant Patient with Hearing in the Nonimplanted Ear , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[19]  B. Moore,et al.  Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  B. Moore,et al.  The effects of hearing loss on growth-of-masking functions for sinusoidal and complex-tone maskers with differing phase spectra , 2007, Hearing Research.

[21]  Brian Roberts,et al.  Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners , 2007, Hearing Research.

[22]  Catherine Semal,et al.  Individual differences in the sensitivity to pitch direction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  B. Moore,et al.  Temporal masking curves for hearing-impaired listeners , 2006, Hearing Research.

[25]  J. Hupé,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Auditory and Visual Bistability Reveal Common Principles of Perceptual Organization , 2006, Current Biology.

[26]  M. Malmierca,et al.  Evidence for a direct, short latency projection from the dorsal cochlear nucleus to the auditory thalamus in the guinea pig , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Acoustic to Electric Pitch Comparisons in Cochlear Implant Subjects with Residual Hearing , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[28]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Auditory-nerve first-spike latency and auditory absolute threshold: a computer model. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  S. Hind Survey of care pathway for auditory processing disorder , 2006 .

[30]  I. Dean,et al.  Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Malmierca,et al.  Novelty detector neurons in the mammalian auditory midbrain , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[32]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Perceptual Organization of Tone Sequences in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Macaques , 2005, Neuron.

[33]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Brain Stem Response to Speech: A Biological Marker of Auditory Processing , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[34]  D. McAlpine,et al.  Neural sensitivity to interaural envelope delays in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  J. Ashmore,et al.  Fast vesicle replenishment allows indefatigable signalling at the first auditory synapse , 2005, Nature.

[36]  Sygal Amitay,et al.  Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Richard E. Turner,et al.  The processing and perception of size information in speech sounds. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  I. Nelken,et al.  Multiple Time Scales of Adaptation in Auditory Cortex Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  J. Arezzo,et al.  Auditory stream segregation in monkey auditory cortex: effects of frequency separation, presentation rate, and tone duration. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Robert P Carlyon,et al.  Across-frequency interference effects in fundamental frequency discrimination: questioning evidence for two pitch mechanisms. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  B. Fischer,et al.  The effect of practice on low-level auditory discrimination, phonological skills, and spelling in dyslexia. , 2004, Dyslexia.

[44]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  Christopher J Plack,et al.  Factors affecting the duration effect in pitch perception for unresolved complex tones. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  C. Darwin,et al.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  Michael K. Qin,et al.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  B Lütkenhöner,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  R. Cowan,et al.  Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking , 2003, Hearing Research.

[50]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Hierarchical Processing in Spoken Language Comprehension , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  I. Nelken,et al.  Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  J. Guinan,et al.  Separate mechanical processes underlie fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[53]  Cornelia Kopp-Scheinpflug,et al.  Interaction of Excitation and Inhibition in Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus Neurons That Receive Large Endbulb Synaptic Endings , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Manuel S Malmierca,et al.  Direct Projections from Cochlear Nuclear Complex to Auditory Thalamus in the Rat , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Limitations on rate discrimination. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  M. Boyle,et al.  Multiattribute and Single‐Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System , 2002, Medical care.

[57]  S. Klein,et al.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  D. Oliver,et al.  Distinct K Currents Result in Physiologically Distinct Cell Types in the Inferior Colliculus of the Rat , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  L. Wiegrebe,et al.  Searching for the time constant of neural pitch extraction. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  Mitchell Steinschneider,et al.  Neural correlates of auditory stream segregation in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey , 2001, Hearing Research.

[61]  G. Clark,et al.  Electrode Discrimination and Speech Perception in Young Children Using Cochlear Implants , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[62]  H J McDermott,et al.  The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  W. T. Nelson,et al.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  M. Giard,et al.  Auditory-Visual Integration during Multimodal Object Recognition in Humans: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  R. Shannon,et al.  Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  L M Collins,et al.  Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Time course of forward masking tuning curves in cat primary auditory cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  S. Shamma,et al.  Analysis of dynamic spectra in ferret primary auditory cortex. II. Prediction of unit responses to arbitrary dynamic spectra. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[69]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[70]  Michael B. Calford,et al.  Monaural inhibition in cat auditory cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[71]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones, two-tone complexes, and bands of noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  D R Moore,et al.  Free-field binaural unmasking in ferrets. , 1994, Behavioral neuroscience.

[73]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[74]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[75]  I. Winter,et al.  Responses of single units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea pig , 1990, Hearing Research.

[76]  R. Fay,et al.  Hearing in Vertebrates: A Psychophysics Databook , 1988 .

[77]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[78]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[79]  R. Peters,et al.  Pitch for nonsimultaneous successive harmonics in quiet and noise. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[80]  B L Scott,et al.  A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[81]  R. R. Pfeiffer Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus:Wave Forms of Extracellularly Recorded Spike Potentials , 1966, Science.

[82]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[83]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Effects of concurrent and sequential streaming in comodulation masking release , 2005 .

[84]  H. Redies,et al.  Functional organization of the auditory thalamus in the guinea pig , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[85]  Christian Kaernbach,et al.  The memory of noise. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[86]  L Collet,et al.  Influence of focused auditory attention on cochlear activity in humans. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[87]  B C Moore,et al.  Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. , 1999, British journal of audiology.

[88]  B C Moore,et al.  Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.