Learning from Errors: Error-Related Neural Activity Predicts Improvements in Future Inhibitory Control Performance

Failure to adapt performance following an error is a debilitating symptom of many neurological and psychiatric conditions. Healthy individuals readily adapt their behavior in response to an error, an ability thought to be subserved by the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC). However, it remains unclear how humans adaptively alter cognitive control behavior when they reencounter situations that were previously failed minutes or days ago. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined neural activity during a Go/No-go response inhibition task that provided the opportunity for participants to learn from their errors. When they failed to inhibit their response, they were shown the same target stimulus during the next No-go trial, which itself could occur up to 20 trials after its initial presentation. Activity within the pMFC was significantly greater for initial errors that were subsequently corrected than for errors that were repeated later in the display sequence. Moreover, pMFC activity during errors predicted future responses despite a sizeable interval (on average 12 trials) between an error and the next No-go stimulus. Our results indicate that changes in cognitive control performance can be predicted using error-related activity. The increased likelihood of adaptive changes occurring during periods of recent success is consistent with models of error-related activity that argue for the influence of outcome expectancy (Holroyd and Coles, 2002; Brown and Braver, 2005). The findings may also help to explain the diminished error-related neural activity in such clinical conditions as schizophrenia, as well as the propensity for perseverative behavior in these clinical groups.

[1]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[2]  H. Garavan,et al.  Dissociable Executive Functions in the Dynamic Control of Behavior: Inhibition, Error Detection, and Correction , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[5]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance , 2004, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[7]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[10]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Avoiding another mistake: Error and posterror neural activity associated with adaptive posterror behavior change , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  Bradley R. Buchsbaum,et al.  The Search for the Phonological Store: From Loop to Convolution , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Mayeux,et al.  Circuit mechanisms underlying memory encoding and retrieval in the long axis of the hippocampal formation , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[14]  Norbert Kathmann,et al.  Neural correlates of error awareness , 2007, NeuroImage.

[15]  S. Bunge How we use rules to select actions: A review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  B R Rosen,et al.  Encoding novel face‐name associations: A functional MRI study , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Deriving the optimal number of events for an event-related fMRI study based on the spatial extent of activation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[18]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  No‐go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in error processing: A comparison of errors made with and without awareness , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Human medial frontal cortex activity predicts learning from errors. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Dynamic Dopamine Modulation in the Basal Ganglia: A Neurocomputational Account of Cognitive Deficits in Medicated and Nonmedicated Parkinsonism , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[24]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[25]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Error Monitoring Using External Feedback: Specific Roles of the Habenular Complex, the Reward System, and the Cingulate Motor Area Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[27]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Executive “Brake Failure” following Deactivation of Human Frontal Lobe , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[29]  W. Suzuki Making New Memories , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Beyond common resources: the cortical basis for resolving task interference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[31]  M. Reuter,et al.  Genetically Determined Differences in Learning from Errors , 2007, Science.

[32]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Individual differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control , 2006, Brain Research.

[33]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Learned Predictions of Error Likelihood in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2005, Science.

[34]  S. Courtney,et al.  Attention and cognitive control as emergent properties of information representation in working memory , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[35]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Implicit Associative Learning Engages the Hippocampus and Interacts with Explicit Associative Learning , 2005, Neuron.

[36]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[37]  E T Weston,et al.  Brain mechanisms and learning. , 1982, Nursing times.

[38]  Matthew S. Cain,et al.  Rostral and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex make dissociable contributions during antisaccade error commission , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses , 2002, Science.

[40]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Predicting Success: Patterns of Cortical Activation and Deactivation Prior to Response Inhibition , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.