Identifying environmentally and economically optimal bioenergy plant sizes and locations: A spatial model of wood-based SNG value chains

The optimal size and location of bioenergy plants with regards to environmental and economic performance are assessed with a spatially explicit value chain model of the production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from wood. It consists of several individual models for the availability, harvest, transportation, conversion of wood to SNG, electricity and heat, and the use of these products to substitute non-renewable energy services. An optimization strategy is used to choose the optimal technology configuration for plant sizes from 5 to 200 MW and different locations for any desired weighting between the environmental performance based on life cycle assessment (LCA) and the economic performance. While the economic optima are found at plant sizes between 100 and 200 MW, the environmental optima are found in the range of 5e40 MW. This trade-off can be minimized at plant sizes above 25 MW according to the presented model. The most important driver of the environmental performance is the efficient substitution of non-renewable energy, which is a site-specific factor. In comparison to this, spatial factors such as wood availability, harvest, and transportation, have a smaller influence on the environmental performance, at least for a country of the size of Switzerland. The main drivers of the economic performance are the revenues from the sale of the SNG plant’s products and the SNG production costs, but transportation and wood costs also play a role.

[1]  François Maréchal,et al.  Systematic integration of LCA in process systems design: Application to combined fuel and electricity production from lignocellulosic biomass , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[2]  C. Ludwig,et al.  Life cycle assessment of SNG from wood for heating, electricity, and transportation , 2011 .

[3]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[4]  Martin Gassner Process Design Methodology for Thermochemical Production of Fuels from Biomass , 2010 .

[5]  Christoph Walla,et al.  The optimal size for biogas plants , 2008 .

[6]  François Maréchal,et al.  Methodology for the optimal thermo-economic, multi-objective design of thermochemical fuel production from biomass , 2009, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[7]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  Power-law relationships for estimating mass, fuel consumption and costs of energy conversion equipments. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  F. Maréchal,et al.  Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass , 2009 .

[9]  François Maréchal,et al.  Thermo-economic optimisation of the polygeneration of synthetic natural gas (SNG), power and heat from lignocellulosic biomass by gasification and methanation , 2012 .

[10]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Heat, electricity, or transportation? The optimal use of residual and waste biomass in Europe from an environmental perspective. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Paavo Pelkonen,et al.  Optimal Locations for Methanol and CHP Production in Eastern Finland , 2011, BioEnergy Research.

[12]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Assessing wood-based synthetic natural gas technologies using the SWISS-MARKAL model , 2007 .

[13]  François Maréchal,et al.  Combined mass and energy integration in process design at the example of membrane-based gas separation systems , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[14]  Johannes Schmidt,et al.  Cost-effective CO2 emission reduction through heat, power and biofuel production from woody biomass: A spatially explicit comparison of conversion technologies , 2010 .

[15]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[16]  Sylvain Leduc,et al.  Cost-effective policy instruments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and fossil fuel substitution through bioenergy production in Austria. , 2011 .

[17]  Jordi-Roger Riba,et al.  Comparative cost evaluation of heating oil and small-scale wood chips produced from Euro-Mediterranean forests , 2015 .

[18]  Heike Lischke,et al.  Swiss National Forest Inventory: Methods and Models of the Second Assessment , 2001 .

[19]  A. Pérez-Navarro,et al.  Methodology for optimization of distributed biomass resources evaluation, management and final energy use , 2009 .

[20]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[21]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Bioenergy in Switzerland: Assessing the domestic sustainable biomass potential , 2010 .

[22]  Nicolás Ruiz-Reyes,et al.  A Honey Bee Foraging approach for optimal location of a biomass power plant , 2010 .

[23]  François Maréchal,et al.  Environomic design of vehicle energy systems for optimal mobility service , 2014 .

[24]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[25]  Ian McCallum,et al.  Optimal location of lignocellulosic ethanol refineries with polygeneration in Sweden. , 2010 .