An LCA study of an electricity coal supply chain

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to provide methods to find the emission source and estimate the amount of waste gas emissions in the electricity coal supply chain, establish the model of the environmental impact (burden) in the electricity coal supply chain, detect the critical factor which causes significant environmental impact, and then identify the key control direction and reduce amount of environmental pollution in the electricity coal supply chain. Design/methodology/approach: In this context, life cycle inventory and life cycle assessment of China’s electricity coal were established in three difference stages: coal mining, coal transportation, and coal burning. Then the outcomes were analyzed with the aim to reduce waste gases emissions’ environmental impact in the electricity coal supply chain from the perspective of sensitivity analysis. Findings: The results and conclusion are as follow: (1) In terms of total waste gas emissions in electricity coal supply chain, CO 2 is emitted in the greatest quantity, accounting for 98-99 wt% of the total waste gas emissions. The vast majority of the CO 2 , greater than 93%, is emitted from the power plant when the coal is combusted. (2) Other than CO 2 , the main waste gas is CH 4 , SO 2 and so on. CH 4 is mainly emitted from Coal Bed Methane (CBM), so the option is to consider capturing some of the CH4 from underground mines for an alternative use. SO 2 is mainly emitted from power plant when the coal is combusted. (3) The environmental burden of coal burning subsystem is greatest, followed by the coal mining subsystem, and finally the coal transportation subsystem. Improving the coal-burning efficiency of coal-fired power plant in electricity coal supply chain is the most effective way to reduce the environmental impact of waste gas emissions. (4) Of the three subsystems examined (coal mining, coal transportation, and coal burning), transportation requires the fewest resources and has the lowest waste gas emissions. However, the energy consumption for this subsystem is significant (excluding the mine mouth case), and transportation distance is found to have a substantial effect on the oil consumption and non-coal energy consumption. (5) In electricity coal supply chain, the biggest environmental impact of waste gas emissions is GWP, followed by EP, AP, POCP and ODP, and regional impact is greater than the global impact. Practical implications: The model and methodology established in this paper could be used for environmental impact assessment of waste gas emissions in electricity coal supply chain and sensitivity analysis in China, and it could supply reference and example for similar researches. The data information on life cycle inventory, impact assessment and sensitivity analysis could supply theory and data reference for waste gas emissions control in electricity coal supply chain. Originality/value: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time to study the environmental influence of electricity coal supply chain by employing a LCA approach from life cycle of electricity coal.

[1]  Zongxi Liu,et al.  Research on the Scale-planning Model for the Coal Logistics Center based on Coal Logistics Network Planning , 2011, LISS.

[2]  C. Nielsen,et al.  Establishment of a database of emission factors for atmospheric pollutants from Chinese coal-fired power plants , 2010 .

[3]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Comparison of Three Different LCIA Methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99 , 2003 .

[4]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Environmental assessment of products , 1997 .

[5]  Aie.  Electricity Information 2010 , 2010 .

[6]  Zhihua Wang,et al.  Up-to-date life cycle assessment and comparison study of clean coal power generation technologies in China , 2013 .

[7]  Zeguo Qiu.  On the analysis of building a public information platform based on e-Commerce for coal logistics , 2013 .

[8]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[9]  Ramachandran Kannan,et al.  Life cycle energy, emissions and cost inventory of power generation technologies in Singapore , 2007 .

[10]  Janne Häkli,et al.  Monitoring environmental performance of the forestry supply chain using RFID , 2011, Comput. Ind..

[11]  D. G. Streets,et al.  Sulfur dioxide emissions in China and sulfur trends in East Asia since 2000 , 2010 .

[12]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the natural gas supply chain and power generation options with CO2 capture and storage: Assessment of Qatar natural gas production, LNG transport and power generation in the UK , 2012 .

[13]  F. You,et al.  Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: Multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input–output analysis , 2012 .

[14]  Hiroki Hondo,et al.  Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case , 2005 .

[15]  Guy C.K. Leung,et al.  Coal consumption and economic growth in China , 2011 .

[16]  Álvaro Restrepo,et al.  Exergetic and environmental analysis of a pulverized coal power plant , 2012 .

[17]  S. E R G I O P A C C A † A N D A R P A D H O R V A T.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Building and Operating Electric Power Plants in the Upper Colorado River Basin , 2002 .

[18]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Health effects of electricity generation from coal, oil, and nuclear fuel , 1973 .

[19]  M. Mann,et al.  A life cycle assessment of biomass cofiring in a coal-fired power plant , 2001 .