Validity, reliability and predictive accuracy of the Driving Awareness Questionnaire

Purpose. To examine the psychometric properties of the Driving Awareness Questionnaire (DriveAware) and to compare this rating of awareness of driving ability with the rating made in the context of an on-road assessment. Method. A prospective design was employed to examine the psychometric properties of DriveAware using Rasch analysis. Participants (n = 91) with varying diagnoses were recruited from two driving rehabilitation centres in Sydney, Australia. They completed DriveAware in the context of a standard driving assessment. Awareness of driving ability determined by DriveAware was compared with awareness determined in the on-road assessment. Results. Rasch analysis provided good evidence for construct validity and inter-rater reliability and some evidence for internal reliability of DriveAware. The item hierarchy was logical and goodness-of-fit statistics for four of five items were within an acceptable range. The test had a moderate reliability index (0.73). Measurement precision could be improved by including more items to assess drivers with little awareness. When compared with the on-road measure of awareness, the best DriveAware cut-off score yielded sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 94%. Conclusion. This short and easy-to-administer test could provide a useful tool with sound psychometric properties to measure awareness of driving ability.

[1]  Lynnette G. Kay,et al.  Predicting fitness to drive using the visual recognition slide test (USyd). , 2008, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[2]  N. Pachana,et al.  Assessment of Insight and Self-Awareness in Older Drivers , 2006 .

[3]  Elena K. Festa,et al.  Neuropsychological deficits associated with driving performance in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease , 2005, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[4]  T. Kallanranta,et al.  Evaluation of the driving ability in disabled persons: A practitioners' view , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  F. Verhey,et al.  Awareness in dementia: A review of assessment methods and measures , 2005, Aging & mental health.

[6]  L. Clare,et al.  Awareness in dementia: Conceptual issues , 2005, Aging & mental health.

[7]  Laura E. Knouse,et al.  Accuracy of Self-Evaluation in Adults with ADHD , 2005, Journal of attention disorders.

[8]  C. Hawley,et al.  Return to driving after traumatic brain injury: a British perspective , 2005, Brain injury.

[9]  G. Papandonatos,et al.  Prediction of On‐Road Driving Performance in Patients with Early Alzheimer's Disease , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  Neil Frude,et al.  The use of a cognitive battery to predict who will fail an on-road driving test. , 2004, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[11]  Linda Clare,et al.  Awareness in early-stage Alzheimer's disease: a review of methods and evidence. , 2004, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[12]  R. Doody,et al.  Dementia Deficits Scale: Rating Self-Awareness of Deficits , 2004, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[13]  K. Wild,et al.  Identifying Driving Impairment in Alzheimer Disease: A Comparison of Self and Observer Reports Versus Driving Evaluation , 2003, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[14]  A. Garratt.  Rasch Analysis of the Roland Disability Questionnaire , 2003, Spine.

[15]  Jim Penny.  Exploring Differential Item Functioning in a 360-Degree Assessment: Rater Source and Method of Delivery , 2003 .

[16]  G. Berríos,et al.  The ‘Object’ of Insight Assessment: Relationship to Insight ‘Structure’ , 2001, Psychopathology.

[17]  K Sundet,et al.  Comprehensive driving assessment: neuropsychological testing and on-road evaluation of brain injured patients. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[18]  L Hakamies-Blomqvist,et al.  Older drivers' accident risk: conceptual and methodological issues. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  J. Duchek,et al.  Reliability of the Washington University Road Test. A performance-based assessment for drivers with dementia of the Alzheimer type. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[20]  J. Morris,et al.  Driving Performance in Persons with Mild Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type , 1993, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[21]  D. Tranel,et al.  Awareness of disease states following cerebral infarction, dementia, and head trauma: Standardized assessment , 1989 .

[22]  D. Schacter,et al.  Unawareness of deficits in neuropsychological syndromes. , 1989, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[23]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[24]  Janine G. Walker,et al.  Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults. , 2005, Clinical psychology review.

[25]  N. Raju,et al.  Differential item and test functioning. , 2002 .

[26]  J. Linacre,et al.  Sample size and item calibration stability , 1994 .