OBJECTIVE
After arguing that most community-based organizations (CBOs) function as complex adaptive systems, this white paper describes the evaluation goals, questions, indicators, and methods most important at different stages of community-based health information outreach.
MAIN POINTS
This paper presents the basic characteristics of complex adaptive systems and argues that the typical CBO can be considered this type of system. It then presents evaluation as a tool for helping outreach teams adapt their outreach efforts to the CBO environment and thus maximize success. Finally, it describes the goals, questions, indicators, and methods most important or helpful at each stage of evaluation (community assessment, needs assessment and planning, process evaluation, and outcomes assessment).
LITERATURE
Literature from complex adaptive systems as applied to health care, business, and evaluation settings is presented. Evaluation models and applications, particularly those based on participatory approaches, are presented as methods for maximizing the effectiveness of evaluation in dynamic CBO environments.
CONCLUSION
If one accepts that CBOs function as complex adaptive systems-characterized by dynamic relationships among many agents, influences, and forces-then effective evaluation at the stages of community assessment, needs assessment and planning, process evaluation, and outcomes assessment is critical to outreach success.
[1]
Glenda H. Eoyang,et al.
Evaluation in a Complex Adaptive System
,
1998
.
[2]
Cynthia A Olney,et al.
High school peer tutors teach MedlinePlus: a model for Hispanic outreach.
,
2005,
Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[3]
T. Henner,et al.
Evaluation from Start to Finish: Incorporating Comprehensive Assessment into a Training Program for Public Health Professionals
,
2004,
Health promotion practice.
[4]
A. Joseph,et al.
Identifying disability: comparing house-to-house survey and rapid rural appraisal.
,
1999,
Health policy and planning.
[5]
R R McDaniel,et al.
Practice jazz: understanding variation in family practices using complexity science.
,
2001,
The Journal of family practice.
[6]
K C Stange,et al.
Understanding change in primary care practice using complexity theory.
,
1998,
The Journal of family practice.
[7]
E. Sobo,et al.
Rapid Assessment with Qualitative Telephone Interviews: Lessons from an Evaluation of California’s Healthy Families Program & Medi-Cal for Children
,
2003
.
[8]
Jessica Dart,et al.
A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool: The Most Significant Change Technique:
,
2003
.