Three‐Stage Decision‐Making Model under Restricted Conditions for Emergency Response to Ships Not under Control

A ship that is not under control (NUC) is a typical incident that poses serious problems when in confined waters close to shore. The emergency response to NUC ships is to select the best risk control options, which is a challenge in restricted conditions (e.g., time limitation, resource constraint, and information asymmetry), particularly in inland waterway transportation. To enable a quick and effective response, this article develops a three-stage decision-making framework for NUC ship handling. The core of this method is (1) to propose feasible options for each involved entity (e.g., maritime safety administration, NUC ship, and ships passing by) under resource constraint in the first stage, (2) to select the most feasible options by comparing the similarity of the new case and existing cases in the second stage, and (3) to make decisions considering the cooperation between the involved organizations by using a developed Bayesian network in the third stage. Consequently, this work provides a useful tool to achieve well-organized management of NUC ships.

[1]  Yonghong Liu,et al.  Application of Bayesian Networks in Quantitative Risk Assessment of Subsea Blowout Preventer Operations , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Andrew J Davies,et al.  Bayesian inference-based environmental decision support systems for oil spill response strategy selection. , 2015, Marine pollution bulletin.

[3]  Bing Wu,et al.  Analysis of the operational energy efficiency for inland river ships , 2013 .

[4]  Lili Liu,et al.  Modeling method of cascading crisis events based on merging Bayesian Network , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Sabine Knapp,et al.  Global ship risk profiles: Safety and the marine environment , 2011 .

[6]  F. Liu,et al.  An approach to group decision making based on interval multiplicative and fuzzy preference relations by using projection , 2013 .

[7]  Kin Keung Lai,et al.  A distance-based group decision-making methodology for multi-person multi-criteria emergency decision support , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Michael R Greenberg,et al.  Risk‐Based Decision Support Tools: Protecting Rail‐Centered Transit Corridors from Cascading Effects , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  Kyu-Yeul Lee,et al.  Cell-based evacuation simulation considering human behavior in a passenger ship , 2012 .

[10]  Marcelo Ramos Martins,et al.  Application of Bayesian Belief networks to the human reliability analysis of an oil tanker operation focusing on collision accidents , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  A. I. Ölçer,et al.  A Case‐based Decision Support System for Flooding Crises Onboard Ships , 2006, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[12]  Tingting Zhao,et al.  Integration of multi-technology on oil spill emergency preparedness. , 2012, Marine pollution bulletin.

[13]  Fumio Shintani Consideration on the Amendments and the Uniform Application to International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS), 1972 , 1981 .

[14]  Yang Wang,et al.  Selection of maritime safety control options for NUC ships using a hybrid group decision-making approach , 2016 .

[15]  José Orlando Gomes,et al.  Analysis of the resilience of team performance during a nuclear emergency response exercise. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  David Mendonça,et al.  Designing gaming simulations for the assessment of group decision support systems in emergency response , 2006 .

[17]  Xinping Yan,et al.  Effectiveness of maritime safety control in different navigation zones using a spatial sequential DEA model: Yangtze River case. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Jin Wang,et al.  Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze River , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Kun Ma,et al.  A M–H method-based decision support system for flooding emergencies onboard warship , 2013 .

[20]  Wang Yong,et al.  Emergency decision model with multiple stages,multiple objectives,and multidivisional cooperation , 2010 .

[21]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  A Virtual Environment for Decision Support in Ship Damage Control , 2007, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[23]  Jin Wang,et al.  A subjective approach for ballast water risk estimation , 2013 .

[24]  Sol Ha,et al.  Advanced ship evacuation analysis using a cell-based simulation model , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[25]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Evaluation of offshore emergency preparedness in view of rare accidents , 2011 .

[26]  Renato A. Krohling,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Bayesian network model of maritime safety management , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Andrzej Jasionowski,et al.  Decision support for ship flooding crisis management , 2011 .

[29]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Modeling the risk of ship grounding—a literature review from a risk management perspective , 2014 .

[30]  Lynn A Maguire,et al.  Managing Wildfire Events: Risk‐Based Decision Making Among a Group of Federal Fire Managers , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  Zhenliang Liao,et al.  Adaptation methodology of CBR for environmental emergency preparedness system based on an Improved Genetic Algorithm , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  J. Wang,et al.  Formal safety assessment of containerships , 2001 .

[33]  Wei Shi,et al.  A temporal accessibility model for assessing the ability of search and rescue in Nansha Islands, South China Sea , 2014 .

[34]  Kevin X. Li,et al.  Ship safety index , 2014 .

[35]  B. Rittichainuwat,et al.  Tourists' and tourism suppliers' perceptions toward crisis management on tsunami , 2013 .

[36]  James Nga-Kwok Liu,et al.  Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[37]  Dimitris Spanos,et al.  On the time for the abandonment of flooded passenger ships due to collision damages , 2014 .

[38]  Z. Yue Approach to group decision making based on determining the weights of experts by using projection method , 2012 .

[39]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting , 2007, Knowl. Based Syst..

[40]  Wenmao Liu,et al.  Emergency resources demand prediction using case-based reasoning , 2012 .

[41]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[42]  Jin Wang,et al.  Formal safety assessment of cruise ships , 2004 .

[43]  Paolo Trucco,et al.  A Bayesian Belief Network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: A case study in maritime transportation , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[44]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified TOPSIS method , 2011 .

[45]  Muhammad Usman,et al.  A modified CREAM to human reliability quantification in marine engineering , 2013 .

[46]  Angelo Corallo,et al.  A knowledge-based decision support system for shipboard damage control , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..