Factors Associated with Time to Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment for Prostate Cancer in a Multi-Institutional Cohort

Purpose: We examined the demographic and clinicopathological parameters associated with the time to convert from active surveillance to treatment among men with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: A multi-institutional cohort of 7,279 patients managed with active surveillance had data and biospecimens collected for germline genetic analyses. Results: Of 6,775 men included in the analysis, 2,260 (33.4%) converted to treatment at a median followup of 6.7 years. Earlier conversion was associated with higher Gleason grade groups (GG2 vs GG1 adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.57, 95% CI 1.36–1.82; ≥GG3 vs GG1 aHR 1.77, 95% CI 1.29–2.43), serum prostate specific antigen concentrations (aHR per 5 ng/ml increment 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.25), tumor stages (cT2 vs cT1 aHR 1.58, 95% CI 1.41–1.77; ≥cT3 vs cT1 aHR 4.36, 95% CI 3.19–5.96) and number of cancerous biopsy cores (3 vs 1–2 cores aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.37–1.84; ≥4 vs 1–2 cores aHR 3.29, 95% CI 2.94–3.69), and younger age (age continuous per 5-year increase aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93–0.99). Patients with high-volume GG1 tumors had a shorter interval to conversion than those with low-volume GG1 tumors and behaved like the higher-risk patients. We found no significant association between the time to conversion and self-reported race or genetic ancestry. Conclusions: A shorter time to conversion from active surveillance to treatment was associated with higher-risk clinicopathological tumor features. Furthermore, patients with high-volume GG1 tumors behaved similarly to those with intermediate and high-risk tumors. An exploratory analysis of self-reported race and genetic ancestry revealed no association with the time to conversion.

[1]  J. Schenk,et al.  Re: African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study. , 2020, The Journal of urology.

[2]  C. Pettaway,et al.  Active Surveillance for Black Men With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. , 2020, JAMA.

[3]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Association Between African American Race and Clinical Outcomes in Men Treated for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance. , 2020, JAMA.

[4]  M. Terris,et al.  Development and Validation of a Clinical Prognostic Stage Group System for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Using Disease-Specific Mortality Results From the International Staging Collaboration for Cancer of the Prostate. , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[5]  Ravi B. Parikh,et al.  Comparison by Race of Conservative Management for Low-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancers in Veterans From 2004 to 2018 , 2020, JAMA network open.

[6]  K. Macura,et al.  Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort. , 2020, European urology.

[7]  D. Kuban,et al.  Determining Clinically-Based Factors Associated with Reclassification in the Pre-MRI Era using a Large Prospective Active Surveillance Cohort. , 2019, Urology.

[8]  A. Sisk,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer , 2019, JAMA network open.

[9]  M. Terris,et al.  Association of Black Race With Prostate Cancer-Specific and Other-Cause Mortality. , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[10]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in Black Patients. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2019, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[12]  M. Kattan,et al.  Reasons for Discontinuing Active Surveillance: Assessment of 21 Centres in 12 Countries in the Movember GAP3 Consortium. , 2019, European urology.

[13]  B. Mahal,et al.  Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality Across Gleason Scores in Black vs Nonblack Men , 2018, JAMA.

[14]  David C. Miller,et al.  National Trends in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Validation of Medicare Claims-based Algorithms. , 2018, Urology.

[15]  Liying Zhang,et al.  The Movember Foundation's GAP3 cohort: a profile of the largest global prostate cancer active surveillance database to date , 2018, BJU international.

[16]  A. Finelli,et al.  Active surveillance review: contemporary selection criteria, follow-up, compliance and outcomes , 2018, Translational andrology and urology.

[17]  Richard E. Fan,et al.  Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Varies Substantially Across Radiologists. , 2017, European urology focus.

[18]  Ronald C. Chen,et al.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[19]  E. Schaeffer,et al.  Is active surveillance a suitable option for African American men with prostate cancer? A systemic literature review , 2017, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[20]  David Gillatt,et al.  10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  M. Roobol,et al.  A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment. , 2016, European urology.

[22]  Kassandra I. Alcaraz,et al.  Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: Progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[23]  Mufaddal Mamawala,et al.  Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Kirsten L. Greene,et al.  Extended followup and risk factors for disease reclassification in a large active surveillance cohort for localized prostate cancer. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[25]  P. Stattin,et al.  Five-year nationwide follow-up study of active surveillance for prostate cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[26]  Danny Vesprini,et al.  Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  M. Soloway,et al.  Clinical and demographic characteristics associated with prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[28]  David H. Alexander,et al.  Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. , 2009, Genome research.

[29]  K. Pienta,et al.  Effect of age and race on the survival of men with prostate cancer in the Metropolitan Detroit tricounty area, 1973 to 1987. , 1995, Urology.

[30]  C. Boring,et al.  Cancer statistics for african americans , 1992, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[31]  J J Shuster,et al.  Median follow-up in clinical trials. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.