Participatory Funding Coordination: Model, Axioms and Rules

We present a new model of collective decision making that captures important crowd-funding and donor coordination scenarios. In the setting, there is a set of projects (each with its own cost) and a set of agents (that have their budgets as well as preferences over the projects). An outcome is a set of projects that are funded along with the specific contributions made by the agents. For the model, we identify meaningful axioms that capture concerns including fairness, efficiency, and participation incentives. We then propose desirable rules for the model and study, which sets of axioms can be satisfied simultaneously. An experimental study indicates the relative performance of different rules as well as the price of enforcing fairness axioms.

[1]  Till Fluschnik,et al.  Fair Knapsack , 2017, AAAI.

[2]  Dominik Peters,et al.  Funding Public Projects: A Case for the Nash Product Rule , 2020, WINE.

[3]  W. MacAskill Effective Altruism: Introduction , 2017 .

[4]  Dominik Peters Economic Design for Effective Altruism , 2019, The Future of Economic Design.

[5]  K. Liket,et al.  Doing good better: How effective altruism can help you make a difference - William MacAskill , 2016 .

[6]  L. Corazzini,et al.  Donor coordination in project funding: Evidence from a threshold public goods experiment , 2015 .

[7]  Martin Lackner,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of Multi-Winner Rules , 2019, IJCAI.

[8]  Haris Aziz,et al.  Participatory Budgeting: Models and Approaches , 2020, Pathways Between Social Science and Computational Social Science.

[9]  Barton L. Lipman,et al.  Provision of Public Goods: Fully Implementing the Core through Private Contributions , 1989 .

[10]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Crowdfunding , 2013, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[11]  Haris Aziz,et al.  Justified representation in approval-based committee voting , 2014, Social Choice and Welfare.

[12]  Kamesh Munagala,et al.  The Core of the Participatory Budgeting Problem , 2016, WINE.

[13]  Piotr Faliszewski,et al.  Properties of multiwinner voting rules , 2014, Social Choice and Welfare.

[14]  Dominik Peters,et al.  Donor Coordination: Collective Distribution of Individual Contributions , 2019 .

[15]  Sujit Gujar,et al.  Crowdfunding Public Projects with Provision Point: A Prediction Market Approach , 2016, ECAI.

[16]  Vitalik Buterin,et al.  A Flexible Design for Funding Public Goods , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Sujit Gujar,et al.  Civic Crowdfunding for Agents with Negative Valuations and Agents with Asymmetric Beliefs , 2019, IJCAI.

[18]  Ashish Goel,et al.  Knapsack Voting for Participatory Budgeting , 2019, ACM Trans. Economics and Comput..

[19]  Piotr Faliszewski,et al.  A Framework for Approval-based Budgeting Methods , 2018, AAAI.