Diets with low forage concentration may depress feed intake and average daily gain, while diets with high forage concentration may limit feed intake due to rumen filling. Adequate forage level may range from 7% to 14% in ration for feedlot lambs, depending on forage source and ingredient composition. Small amounts of good quality forage may improve growth performance of sheep in the first stage of fattening; however, higher energy efficiency can be obtained in feedlot lambs fed diets with low-quality roughage. Forages are required in low percentages in fattening diets for ruminants, mainly as functional ingredients, since they contribute by stimulating rumination and saliva production that reduce acidosis-related digestive disorders. The functionality of forage is influenced by its neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentration. Feedlot cattle may have different productive performance when fed diets with constant levels of forages of different quality. These differences can be reduced when diets are formulated to contain similar NDF levels from forage. Diets for feedlot cattle formulated at 15% of NDF from forage can moderate ruminal upsets without altering feed intake; however, the optimal level might be between 4% and 8% of NDF from forage. In feedlot lambs there is limited information. Approximately 6% of NDF from forage may be included in the ration for maximum feed efficiency. At these NDF levels from forage, the forage source may have minimal influence on growth performance of feedlot animals. There are few reports on lambs on intensive feeding indicating maximum and minimum levels of NDF from forage in diets for better growth performance. This is an important scientific topic that must be considered in feedlot lambs to improve their productive performance.
[1]
K. Swanson,et al.
Influence of forage source and forage inclusion level on growth performance, feeding behavior, and carcass characteristics in finishing steers.
,
2017,
Journal of animal science.
[2]
T. Berchielli,et al.
Effects of different sources of forage in high-concentrate diets on fermentation parameters, ruminal biohydrogenation and microbiota in Nellore feedlot steers
,
2016,
The Journal of Agricultural Science.
[3]
M. Galyean,et al.
Nutritional recommendations of feedlot consulting nutritionists: The 2015 New Mexico State and Texas Tech University survey.
,
2016,
Journal of animal science.
[4]
K. Beauchemin,et al.
Relative contribution of ruminal buffering systems to pH regulation in feedlot cattle fed either low- or high-forage diets.
,
2016,
Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.
[5]
R. Zinn,et al.
Influence of forage NDF level, source and pelletizing on growth performance, dietary energetics, and characteristics of digestive function for feedlot cattle
,
2013
.
[6]
N. Papi,et al.
Effects of dietary forage-to-concentrate ratios on performance and carcass characteristics of growing fat-tailed lambs
,
2011
.
[7]
M. Galyean,et al.
Effects of roughage source and level on intake by feedlot cattle
,
2003
.
[8]
J. Kawas,et al.
Productive performance and carcass characteristics of lambs fed finishing ration containing various forage levels
,
2002
.
[9]
L. Tedeschi,et al.
Energy efficiency of growing ram lambs fed concentrate-based diets with different roughage sources.
,
2014,
Journal of animal science.