Nature of light correlations in ghost imaging

We investigate the nature of correlations in Gaussian light sources used for ghost imaging. We adopt methods from quantum information theory to distinguish genuinely quantum from classical correlations. Combining a microscopic analysis of speckle-speckle correlations with an effective coarse-grained description of the beams, we show that quantum correlations exist even in ‘classical'-like thermal light sources, and appear relevant for the implementation of ghost imaging in the regime of low illumination. We further demonstrate that the total correlations in the thermal source beams effectively determine the quality of the imaging, as quantified by the signal-to-noise ratio.

[1]  G. Brida,et al.  Systematic analysis of signal-to-noise ratio in bipartite ghost imaging with classical and quantum light , 2011, 1103.1281.

[2]  M. Paris,et al.  Nonclassicality criteria from phase-space representations and information-theoretical constraints are maximally inequivalent. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[3]  U. Andersen,et al.  Experimental investigation of the evolution of gaussian quantum discord in an open system. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[4]  A. Datta,et al.  Quantum versus classical correlations in Gaussian states. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[5]  A. Gatti,et al.  High-resolution ghost image and ghost diffraction experiments with thermal light. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[6]  Giuliano Scarcelli,et al.  Can two-photon correlation of chaotic light be considered as correlation of intensity fluctuations? , 2006, Physical review letters.

[7]  Robert W. Boyd,et al.  Comparison of the signal-to-noise characteristics of quantum versus thermal ghost imaging , 2010 .

[8]  Shih,et al.  Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[9]  Enrico Brambilla,et al.  Entangled imaging and wave-particle duality: from the microscopic to the macroscopic realm , 2003, 2003 European Quantum Electronics Conference. EQEC 2003 (IEEE Cat No.03TH8665).

[10]  Y. Shih,et al.  Turbulence-free ghost imaging , 2011 .

[11]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro.  Comment on "Turbulence-free ghost imaging" [Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 111115 (2011)] , 2012 .

[12]  Vlatko Vedral,et al.  Quantum discord and other measures of quantum correlation , 2011 .

[13]  Adolfo V. T. Cartaxo,et al.  Advances in Lasers and Electro Optics , 2010 .

[14]  A. Gatti,et al.  Ghost imaging with thermal light: comparing entanglement and classical correlation. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[15]  V. Vedral,et al.  Classical, quantum and total correlations , 2001, quant-ph/0105028.

[16]  Robert W Boyd,et al.  Quantum and classical coincidence imaging. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[17]  M. Barbieri,et al.  Homodyne estimation of Gaussian quantum discord. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[18]  W. Zurek,et al.  Quantum discord: a measure of the quantumness of correlations. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[19]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  Response to “The physics of ghost imaging—nonlocal interference or local intensity fluctuation correlation?” , 2012, Quantum Inf. Process..

[20]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  Unified theory of ghost imaging with Gaussian-state light , 2007, 0712.3554.

[21]  Rubin,et al.  Transverse correlation in optical spontaneous parametric down-conversion. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[22]  M C Teich,et al.  Role of entanglement in two-photon imaging. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[23]  P. Marian,et al.  Inseparability of mixed two-mode Gaussian states generated with a SU(1,1) interferometer , 2001 .

[24]  A. Acín,et al.  Almost all quantum states have nonclassical correlations , 2009, 0908.3157.

[25]  A. Gatti,et al.  Simultaneous near-field and far-field spatial quantum correlations in the high-gain regime of parametric down-conversion , 2003, quant-ph/0306116.

[26]  F. Illuminati,et al.  Entanglement in continuous-variable systems: recent advances and current perspectives , 2007, quant-ph/0701221.

[27]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  The physics of ghost imaging , 2012, Quantum Information Processing.

[28]  R. Boyd,et al.  "Two-Photon" coincidence imaging with a classical source. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[29]  Z. Merali.  Quantum computing: The power of discord , 2011, Nature.

[30]  J. Shapiro,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio of Gaussian-state ghost imaging , 2008, 2009 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2009 Conference on Quantum electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[31]  T. Ralph,et al.  Observing the operational significance of discord consumption , 2012, Nature Physics.

[32]  Shih,et al.  Observation of two-photon "ghost" interference and diffraction. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[33]  Y. Shih.  Quantum Imaging , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[34]  Yanhua Shih.  The physics of ghost imaging: nonlocal interference or local intensity fluctuation correlation? , 2012, Quantum Inf. Process..

[35]  M. Paris,et al.  Gaussian quantum discord. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[36]  L. Mandel,et al.  Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics , 1995 .

[37]  Y. Shih,et al.  Two-photon "ghost" imaging with thermal light , 2004, 2005 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[38]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  Optical communication with two-photon coherent states-Part I: Quantum-state propagation and quantum-noise , 1978, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.