Modeling interval-censored, clustered cow udder quarter infection times through the shared gamma frailty model

Time to infection data are often simultaneously clustered and interval-censored. The time to infection is not known exactly; it is only known to have occurred within a certain interval. Moreover, observations often occur in clusters. Consequently, the independence assumption does not hold. Here we propose an extension of the shared gamma frailty model to handle the interval censoring and clustering simultaneously. We show that the frailties can be integrated out analytically, allowing maximization of the marginal likelihood to obtain parameter estimates. We apply our method to a longitudinal study with periodic follow-up on dairy cows to investigate the effect of parameters at the cow level (e.g., parity) and also parameters that can change within the cow (e.g., front or rear udder quarter) on time to infection. Dairy cows were assessed approximately monthly for the presence of a bacterial infection at the udder-quarter level, thus generating interval-censored data. Obviously, the four udder quarters are clustered within the cow. Based on simulations, we find that ignoring the interval-censored nature of the data can lead to biased parameter estimates.

[1]  Rosalind Wright,et al.  Analysis of clustered and interval censored data from a community‐based study in asthma , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  B. Radke A demonstration of interval-censored survival analysis. , 2003, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[3]  D. Finkelstein,et al.  A proportional hazards model for interval-censored failure time data. , 1986, Biometrics.

[4]  R. W. Adkinson,et al.  Distribution of clinical mastitis among quarters of the bovine udder. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  D. Collett Modelling survival data , 1994 .

[6]  M. Ohtaki,et al.  Aspects of the Armitage–Doll gamma frailty model for cancer incidence data , 2004 .

[7]  H. Barkema,et al.  Relationship between teat-end callosity and occurrence of clinical mastitis. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  A. Kruif,et al.  Influence of parity and stage of lactation on the somatic cell count in bacteriologically negative dairy cows. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  P. Grambsch,et al.  Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model , 2000 .

[10]  Christine Fourichon,et al.  Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. , 2003, Veterinary research.

[11]  D. Commenges,et al.  Maximum Penalized Likelihood Estimation in a Gamma-Frailty Model , 2003, Lifetime data analysis.

[12]  D. Oakes,et al.  Bivariate survival models induced by frailties , 1989 .

[13]  T. Lam,et al.  Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  P. Janssen,et al.  A Bayesian approach to jointly estimate centre and treatment by centre heterogeneity in a proportional hazards model , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  D. Galligan,et al.  Estimation of interdependence among quarters of the bovine udder with subclinical mastitis and implications for analysis. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  R. Gray Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model , 2002 .

[17]  H. Wisselink,et al.  Dutch national mastitis survey. The effect of herd and animal factors on somatic cell count , 1989 .

[18]  J. Weller,et al.  Genetic and environmental relationships among somatic cell count, bacterial infection, and clinical mastitis. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  J. Klein,et al.  Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data , 1997 .

[20]  B. Turnbull The Empirical Distribution Function with Arbitrarily Grouped, Censored, and Truncated Data , 1976 .

[21]  W. D. Ray 4. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research , 1995 .

[22]  David Collett Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research , 1994 .