Suturing techniques and postoperative management in penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom

Aims To report on the suturing techniques and aspects of postoperative management in penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom. Methods A postal questionnaire was sent to 137 ophthalmic consultants identified from a Royal College of Ophthalmology database as having a special interest in anterior segment surgery. The questionnaire surveyed surgeon preferences for surgical and suturing technique for penetrating keratoplasty surgery, and the postoperative care of corneal grafts. Results In all, 68% of questionnaires were completed and returned: 73% of respondents used a Flieringa ring or equivalent, 94% routinely used cardinal sutures, with 50.5% removing them at the end of the procedure. The most common suturing technique for routine penetrating keratoplasty was a single continuous suture (35%). In these cases, a 10/0 nylon suture was used by 89%. Sixty-six percent changed their technique in high-risk cases, 52% used a 3-1-1 knot, and 75% made a distinction between a reef and granny knot, with 76% using a reef. Thirty percent buried the knots within the donor material, and 29% within the host tissue. Twenty-five percent had no routine time for graft suture removal, but 41% removed them between 1 and 2 years post-surgery. After suture removal, 98% used steroids and 88% used topical antibiotics. Thirty-four percent stopped topical steroids before suture removal, with 38% stopping topical steroids more than 3 months prior to suture removal. Conclusion This survey demonstrates that there is considerable variation in suturing techniques and postoperative care for penetrating keratoplasty. These significant variations in practice need to be considered when interpreting outcomes and research.

[1]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty a report by the american academy of ophthalmology. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[2]  J. Mehta,et al.  Paradigm shifts in corneal transplantation. , 2009, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[3]  T. Dada,et al.  Pediatric keratoplasty. , 2009, Survey of ophthalmology.

[4]  W. Wee,et al.  The Effect of Different Suturing Techniques on Astigmatism after Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2008, Journal of Korean medical science.

[5]  F. C. Lam,et al.  Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty—a cause for concern , 2007, Eye.

[6]  Sujata Das,et al.  Microbial keratitis following corneal transplantation , 2007, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[7]  R. Winter,et al.  Aktueller Stand der mechanischen Hornhautchirurgie - Ergebnisse einer Umfrage bei Mitgliedern der Sektion Kornea der DOG , 2006 .

[8]  C. Siganos,et al.  Astigmatism After Mersilene and Nylon Suture Use for Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2006, Cornea.

[9]  P. Mulder,et al.  Comparison of Complication Rates and Postoperative Astigmatism Between Nylon and Mersilene Sutures for Corneal Transplants in Patients with Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy , 2006, Cornea.

[10]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Prevention and Treatment of Corneal Graft Rejection: Current Practice Patterns (2004) , 2006, Cornea.

[11]  G. Geerling,et al.  [Current state of mechanical corneal surgery - results of a questionnaire to members of the cornea section of the German Society of Ophthalmologists]. , 2006, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[12]  D. Azar,et al.  Smolin and Thoft's the cornea : scientific foundations and clinical practice , 2005 .

[13]  D. Hodge,et al.  Keratometric Astigmatism after Suture Removal in Penetrating Keratoplasty: Double Running Versus Single Running Suture Techniques , 2003, Cornea.

[14]  W. V. Van Meter,et al.  Spontaneous wound dehiscence after removal of single continuous penetrating keratoplasty suture. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[15]  U. Stenevi,et al.  Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  J. Perlman,et al.  Effect of topical anti‐inflammatory drugs on corneal and limbal wound healing , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  C. S. Liu,et al.  Scanning electron microscopic study of monofilament suture knots. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  B. McCarey,et al.  Corneal Wound Healing Strength with Topical Antiinflammatory Drugs , 1995, Cornea.

[19]  P. McDonnell,et al.  A survey of corneal graft practice in the United Kingdom. , 1995, Eye.

[20]  S. Mahjoub,et al.  A comparison of the wound integrity produced by various suture patterns in penetrating keratoplasty: a cadaver eye model. , 1990, Ophthalmic surgery.

[21]  J. McCulley,et al.  A comparison between interrupted and continuous suturing techniques in keratoplasty. , 1990, Cornea.